Beyond Good and Evil | Gradually Hardening Turkish A1-B2 Books

Beyond Good and Evil | Gradually Hardening Turkish A1-B2 Books

This progressive translation technique brings multiple benefits to language learners. It lets you choose the difficulty level that matches your abilities, making sure the material is challenging but not too difficult. By focusing on understanding words in context, this method boosts your comprehension skills. While direct translations are slightly hidden to promote guessing from context, you can always check unfamiliar words. This approach makes learning a new language both engaging and accessible, offering the right mix of difficulty and encouragement. Embark on a journey through translated classics and enjoy the process of learning through reading.

PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthis
bir
a
woman—whatthen?
Istherenot
zemin
ground
forsuspectingthatallphilosophers,insofarastheyhavebeendogmatists,havefailedtounderstandwomen—thatthe
korkunç
terrible
seriousnessandclumsyimportunitywithwhichtheyhave
genellikle
usually
paidtheiraddressestoTruth,havebeenunskilled
ve
and
unseemlymethodsforwinning
bir
a
woman?
Certainlyshehas
asla
never
allowedherselftobewon;
ve
and
atpresenteverykindofdogmastandswith
üzücü
sad
anddiscouragedmien—IF,indeed,itstandsatall!
For
var
there
arescofferswhomaintainthatit
var
has
fallen,thatalldogmaliesontheground—naymore,thatitisatits
son
last
gasp.
Buttospeakseriously,thereare
iyi
good
groundsforhopingthat
tüm
all
dogmatizinginphilosophy,whatever
ciddi
solemn
,whateverconclusiveanddecidedairsit
var
has
assumed,mayhavebeen
sadece
only
anoblepuerilismandtyronism;
ve
and
probablythetimeisathandwhenitwillbeonce
ve
and
againunderstoodWHAThasactuallysufficedforthebasisofsuchimposing
ve
and
absolutephilosophicaledificesasthedogmatistshavehithertoreared:
belki
perhaps
somepopularsuperstitionofimmemorialtime(suchasthesoul-superstition,which,intheformofsubject-
ve
and
ego-superstition,hasnotyetceaseddoingmischief):
belki
perhaps
someplayuponwords,adeceptiononthepartofgrammar,
ya da
or
anaudaciousgeneralizationof
çok
very
restricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.
Thephilosophyofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,was
sadece
only
apromiseforthousandsofyears
sonra
afterwards
,aswasastrologyinstill
önceki
earlier
times,intheserviceof
ki
which
probablymorelabour,gold,acuteness,
ve
and
patiencehavebeenspentthanon
herhangi
any
actualsciencehitherto:
weowetoit,
ve
and
toits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsia
ve
and
Egypt,thegrandstyleof
mimari
architecture
.
Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesupontheheartofhumanitywith
sonsuz
everlasting
claims,allgreatthingshave
önce
first
towanderaboutthe
yeryüzünde
earth
asenormousandawe-inspiringcaricatures:
dogmatic
felsefe
philosophy
hasbeenacaricatureof
bu
this
kind—forinstance,theVedantadoctrineinAsia,
ve
and
PlatonisminEurope.
Letusnotbeungratefultoit,althoughitmustcertainlybeconfessedthatthe
kötü
worst
,themosttiresome,andthe
en
most
dangerousoferrorshithertohasbeen
bir
a
dogmatisterror—namely,Plato'sinventionof
Saf
Pure
SpiritandtheGoodinItself.
Ama
But
nowwhenithasbeensurmounted,whenEurope,ridofthisnightmare,canagaindraw
nefes
breath
freelyandatleastenjoy
bir
a
healthier—sleep,we,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsof
tüm
all
thestrengthwhichthestruggle
karşı
against
thiserrorhasfostered.
Itamountedtotheveryinversionoftruth,
ve
and
thedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—the
temel
fundamental
condition—oflife,tospeakof
Ruh
Spirit
andtheGoodasPlatospokeofthem;
gerçekten
indeed
onemightask,asa
doktor
physician
:
"Howdidsuchamalady
saldırdı
attack
thatfinestproductof
antik
antiquity
,Plato?
HadthewickedSocrates
gerçekten
really
corruptedhim?
WasSocratesafterallacorrupterofyouths,
ve
and
deservedhishemlock?"
Butthe
mücadele
struggle
againstPlato,or—tospeakplainer,
ve
and
forthe"people"—thestruggle
karşı
against
theecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsofChristianity
Için
(FOR
CHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFORTHE"PEOPLE"),producedinEurope
bir
a
magnificenttensionofsoul,suchas
var
had
notexistedanywherepreviously;
with
böyle
such
atenselystrainedbowonecan
artık
now
aimatthefurthestgoals.
As
bir
a
matteroffact,theEuropeanfeels
bu
this
tensionasastateof
sıkıntı
distress
,andtwiceattemptshavebeenmadein
büyük
grand
styletounbendthe
yayı
bow
:
oncebymeansofJesuitism,
ve
and
thesecondtimebymeansof
demokratik
democratic
enlightenment—which,withtheaidoflibertyofthe
basın
press
andnewspaper-reading,might,in
aslında
fact
,bringitaboutthatthe
ruhun
spirit
wouldnotsoeasilyfinditselfin"distress"!
(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—all
kredi
credit
tothem!
butthey
yine
again
madethingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
Ama
But
we,whoareneitherJesuits,nordemocrats,noreven
yeterince
sufficiently
Germans,weGOODEUROPEANS,
ve
and
free,VERYfreespirits—we
var
have
itstill,allthedistressof
ruhun
spirit
andallthetensionofitsbow!
Ve
And
perhapsalsothearrow,the
görev
duty
,and,whoknows?
THEGOALTOAIMAT....
Bölüm
CHAPTER
I.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
TheWilltoTruth,whichistotemptustomanya
tehlikeli
hazardous
enterprise,thefamousTruthfulnessofwhich
tüm
all
philosophershavehithertospokenwithrespect,whatquestionshas
bu
this
WilltoTruthnotlaidbefore
bizi
us
!
Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itis
zaten
already
alongstory;
yetit
görünüyor
seems
asifitwere
neredeyse
hardly
commenced.
Isitanywonderifweatlastgrowdistrustful,losepatience,
ve
and
turnimpatientlyaway?
ThatthisSphinxteachesusatlasttoaskquestionsourselves?
WHOisit
gerçekten
really
thatputsquestionstoushere?
WHAT
gerçekten
really
isthis"WilltoTruth"inus?
In
aslında
fact
wemadealonghaltatthe
soru
question
astotheoriginof
bu
this
Will—untilatlastwecametoan
mutlak
absolute
standstillbeforeayetmore
temel
fundamental
question.
WeinquiredabouttheVALUEof
bu
this
Will.
Grantedthatwewantthetruth:
WHYNOTRATHERuntruth?
And
belirsizlik
uncertainty
?
Evenignorance?
Theproblemofthevalueoftruthpresenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwewhopresentedourselvesbeforetheproblem?
WhichofusistheOedipushere?
Hangi
Which
theSphinx?
Itwould
görünüyor
seem
tobearendezvousofquestions
ve
and
notesofinterrogation.
Andcoulditbebelievedthatitatlastseemstousasiftheproblemhad
hiç
never
beenpropoundedbefore,asifwewerethefirsttodiscernit,getasightofit,
ve
and
RISKRAISINGit?
For
var
there
isriskinraisingit,
belki
perhaps
thereisnogreater
risk
risk
.
2.
"HOWCOULDanythingoriginateoutofitsopposite?
Forexample,truthoutoferror?
ya da
or
theWilltoTruthoutofthewillto
hile
deception
?
orthegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?
ya da
or
thepuresun-brightvisionofthe
bilge
wise
manoutofcovetousness?
Böyle
Such
genesisisimpossible;
whoeverdreamsofitisafool,nay,worse
daha
than
afool;
thingsofthehighestvalue
olmalı
must
haveadifferentorigin,anoriginofTHEIRown—in
bu
this
transitory,seductive,illusory,paltryworld,in
bu
this
turmoilofdelusionandcupidity,theycannot
sahip
have
theirsource.
ButratherinthelapofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealed
Tanrı
God
,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THEREmustbetheirsource,
ve
and
nowhereelse!"—Thismodeof
akıl
reasoning
disclosesthetypicalprejudicebywhichmetaphysiciansof
tüm
all
timescanberecognized,
bu
this
modeofvaluationisatthebackof
tüm
all
theirlogicalprocedure;
throughthis"belief"oftheirs,theyexertthemselvesfortheir"knowledge,"for
şey
something
thatisinthe
sonunda
end
solemnlychristened"theTruth."
The
temel
fundamental
beliefofmetaphysiciansisTHEBELIEFINANTITHESESOFVALUES.
It
hiç
never
occurredeventothewariestofthemto
şüphe
doubt
hereontheverythreshold(where
şüphe
doubt
,however,wasmostnecessary);
thoughtheyhadmade
bir
a
solemnvow,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."
Foritmaybedoubted,firstly,whetherantitheses
var
exist
atall;
andsecondly,whetherthe
popüler
popular
valuationsandantithesesof
değer
value
uponwhichmetaphysicianshavesettheirseal,arenotperhaps
sadece
merely
superficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,besidesbeingprobablymadefromsomecorner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,to
ödünç
borrow
anexpressioncurrentamongpainters.
In
rağmen
spite
ofallthevaluewhichmay
ait
belong
tothetrue,the
olumlu
positive
,andtheunselfish,itmightbe
mümkün
possible
thatahigherand
daha
more
fundamentalvalueforlifegenerallyshouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,toselfishness,
ve
and
cupidity.
Itmightevenbe
mümkün
possible
thatWHATconstitutesthevalueofthose
iyi
good
andrespectedthings,consistspreciselyintheirbeinginsidiously
ilişkili
related
,knotted,andcrochetedtothese
kötü
evil
andapparentlyopposedthings—perhapseveninbeing
esasen
essentially
identicalwiththem.
Perhaps!
Ama
But
whowishestoconcernhimselfwith
böyle
such
dangerous"Perhapses"!
Forthat
araştırma
investigation
onemustawaittheadventofa
yeni
new
orderofphilosophers,suchas
olacak
will
haveothertastesandinclinations,thereverseofthosehithertoprevalent—philosophersofthe
tehlikeli
dangerous
"Perhaps"ineverysenseoftheterm.
Ve
And
tospeakinallseriousness,I
görüyorum
see
suchnewphilosophersbeginningtoappear.
3.
Havingkept
bir
a
sharpeyeonphilosophers,
ve
and
havingreadbetweentheirlines
uzun
long
enough,Inowsaytomyselfthatthe
büyük
greater
partofconsciousthinkingmustbecountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,
ve
and
itissoeveninthecaseof
felsefi
philosophical
thinking;
onehashereto
öğrenmek
learn
anew,asonelearnedanewaboutheredity
ve
and
"innateness."
Aslittleastheactof
doğum
birth
comesintoconsiderationinthe
tüm
whole
processandprocedureofheredity,justaslittleis"being-conscious"OPPOSEDtotheinstinctivein
herhangi
any
decisivesense;
thegreater
kısmı
part
oftheconsciousthinkingof
bir
a
philosopherissecretlyinfluencedbyhisinstincts,
ve
and
forcedintodefinitechannels.
Ve
And
behindalllogicanditsseemingsovereigntyof
hareket
movement
,therearevaluations,ortospeakmoreplainly,physiologicaldemands,forthemaintenanceof
bir
a
definitemodeoflifeForexample,
bu
that
thecertainisworthmorethantheuncertain,
bu
that
illusionislessvaluablethan"truth"suchvaluations,inspiteoftheirregulativeimportanceforUS,
olabilir
might
notwithstandingbeonlysuperficialvaluations,specialkindsofniaiserie,suchasmaybe
gerekli
necessary
forthemaintenanceofbeingssuchasourselves.
Varsayalım
Supposing
,ineffect,thatmanisnot
sadece
just
the"measureofthings."
4.
Thefalsenessof
bir
an
opinionisnotforusany
itiraz
objection
toit:
itishere,
belki
perhaps
,thatournewlanguagesounds
en
most
strangely.
Thequestionis,howfaranopinionislife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,
belki
perhaps
species-rearing,andwearefundamentallyinclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions
Için
(to
whichthesyntheticjudgmentsapriori
ait
belong)
,arethemostindispensabletous,that
olmadan
without
arecognitionoflogicalfictions,
olmadan
without
acomparisonofrealitywiththe
tamamen
purely
IMAGINEDworldofthe
mutlak
absolute
andimmutable,withouta
sürekli
constant
counterfeitingoftheworldby
de
means
ofnumbers,mancouldnotlive—thattherenunciationof
yanlış
false
opinionswouldbearenunciationoflife,anegationoflife.
TORECOGNISEUNTRUTHAS
Bir
A
CONDITIONOFLIFE;
thatis
kesinlikle
certainly
toimpugnthetraditionalideasof
değer
value
inadangerousmanner,
ve
and
aphilosophywhichventurestodoso,hastherebyaloneplaceditselfbeyondgood
ve
and
evil.
5.
Thatwhichcausesphilosopherstoberegardedhalf-distrustfully
ve
and
half-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeated
keşif
discovery
howinnocenttheyare—howoften
ve
and
easilytheymakemistakes
ve
and
losetheirway,inshort,
ne kadar
how
childishandchildliketheyare,—butthatthereisnotenough
dürüst
honest
dealingwiththem,whereastheyallraise
bir
a
loudandvirtuousoutcrywhentheproblemoftruthfulnessis
bile
even
hintedatintheremotestmanner.
Theyallposeasthoughtheirrealopinionshadbeendiscovered
ve
and
attainedthroughtheself-evolvingof
bir
a
cold,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(in
aksine
contrast
toallsortsofmystics,who,fairer
ve
and
foolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,infact,
bir
a
prejudicedproposition,idea,or"suggestion,"
olan
which
isgenerallytheirheart'sdesireabstracted
ve
and
refined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtout
sonra
after
theevent.
Theyarealladvocateswhodonotwishtoberegardedas
böyle
such
,generallyastutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,whichtheydub"truths,"—andVERYfarfromhavingtheconsciencewhich
cesurca
bravely
admitsthistoitself,veryfarfromhavingthe
iyi
good
tasteofthecouragewhichgoessofarastoletthisbe
anlamaya
understood
,perhapstowarnfriend
ya da
or
foe,orincheerful
güven
confidence
andself-ridicule.
ThespectacleoftheTartufferyofoldKant,
aynı derecede
equally
stiffanddecent,with
olan
which
heenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthatlead(more
doğru
correctly
mislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousonessmile,wewhofindno
küçük
small
amusementinspyingoutthe
ince
subtle
tricksofoldmoralists
ve
and
ethicalpreachers.
Or,stillmoreso,thehocus-pocusin
matematiksel
mathematical
form,bymeansofwhichSpinozahas,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyinmail
ve
and
mask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"to
tercüme
translate
thetermfairlyandsquarely—inordertherebytostrike
terör
terror
atonceintotheheartoftheassailantwhoshould
cesaret
dare
tocastaglanceonthat
yenilmez
invincible
maiden,thatPallasAthene:—howmuchofpersonaltimidity
ve
and
vulnerabilitydoesthismasqueradeof
bir
a
sicklyreclusebetray!
6.
Ithas
yavaş yavaş
gradually
becomecleartomewhat
her
every
greatphilosophyuptillnowhasconsistedof—namely,theconfessionofitsoriginator,
ve
and
aspeciesofinvoluntary
ve
and
unconsciousauto-biography;
andmoreoverthatthe
ahlaki
moral
(orimmoral)purposein
her
every
philosophyhasconstitutedthe
gerçek
true
vitalgermoutofwhichthe
tüm
entire
planthasalwaysgrown.
Gerçekten
Indeed
,tounderstandhowtheabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsof
bir
a
philosopherhavebeenarrived
de
at
,itisalwayswell(andwise)to
önce
first
askoneself:
"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Buna göre
Accordingly
,Idonotbelievethat
bir
an
"impulsetoknowledge"isthe
babası
father
ofphilosophy;
butthatanother
dürtü
impulse
,hereaselsewhere,has
sadece
only
madeuseofknowledge(and
yanlış
mistaken
knowledge!)
asaninstrument.
Ama
But
whoeverconsidersthefundamentalimpulsesofmanwithaviewtodetermining
ne kadar
how
fartheymayhave
burada
here
actedasINSPIRINGGENII(orasdemons
ve
and
cobolds),willfindthattheyhave
tüm
all
practicedphilosophyatonetimeoranother,
ve
and
thateachoneofthemwouldhavebeenonlytoo
memnun
glad
tolookuponitselfasthe
nihai
ultimate
endofexistenceandthe
meşru
legitimate
LORDoverallthe
diğer
other
impulses.
Foreveryimpulseisimperious,
ve
and
asSUCH,attemptstophilosophize.
Tobe
elbette
sure
,inthecaseofscholars,inthecaseof
gerçekten
really
scientificmen,itmaybeotherwise—"better,"
eğer
if
youwill;
therethere
olabilir
may
reallybesuchathingasan"impulsetoknowledge,"some
çeşit
kind
ofsmall,independentclock-work,which,whenwellwoundup,
çalışır
works
awayindustriouslytothatend,WITHOUTtherestofthescholarlyimpulsestaking
herhangi
any
materialparttherein.
The
gerçek
actual
"interests"ofthescholar,
bu nedenle
therefore
,aregenerallyinquite
başka
another
direction—inthefamily,perhaps,
ya da
or
inmoney-making,orinpolitics;
itis,in
aslında
fact
,almostindifferentatwhatpointofresearchhis
küçük
little
machineisplaced,andwhetherthe
umutlu
hopeful
youngworkerbecomesa
iyi
good
philologist,amushroomspecialist,
ya da
or
achemist;
heisnotCHARACTERISEDbybecomingthis
ya da
or
that.
Inthephilosopher,onthe
tersine
contrary
,thereisabsolutelynothingimpersonal;
ve
and
aboveall,hismoralityfurnishes
bir
a
decidedanddecisivetestimonyasto
Kim
WHO
HEIS,—thatistosay,inwhat
sırada
order
thedeepestimpulsesofhisnaturestandto
her
each
other.
7.
Howmaliciousphilosopherscanbe!
I
bilmiyorum
know
ofnothingmorestingingthanthejokeEpicurustookthelibertyofmakingonPlato
ve
and
thePlatonists;
hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Inits
orijinal
original
sense,andonthefaceofit,the
kelime
word
signifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessories
ve
and
lick-spittles;
besidesthis,however,itisasmuchastosay,"TheyareallACTORS,thereisnothing
gerçek
genuine
aboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwasa
popüler
popular
nameforanactor).
Ve
And
thelatterisreallythemalignantreproachthatEpicuruscastuponPlato:
hewasannoyedbythegrandiose
tavır
manner
,themiseenscenestyleofwhichPlato
ve
and
hisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnotamaster!
He,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,
kim
who
satconcealedinhis
küçük
little
gardenatAthens,andwrote
üç
three
hundredbooks,perhapsoutof
öfkesi
rage
andambitiousenvyofPlato,
kim
who
knows!
Greecetooka
yüz
hundred
yearstofindout
kim
who
thegarden-godEpicurusreallywas.
Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Thereis
bir
a
pointineveryphilosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthephilosopherappearsonthescene;
ya da
or
,toputitinthewordsof
bir
an
ancientmystery:.
Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
YoudesiretoLIVE"accordingtoNature"?
Oh,you
soylu
noble
Stoics,whatfraudofwords!
Hayal
Imagine
toyourselvesabeing
gibi
like
Nature,boundlesslyextravagant,boundlessly
kayıtsız
indifferent
,withoutpurposeorconsideration,withoutpity
ya da
or
justice,atoncefruitful
ve
and
barrenanduncertain:
imaginetoyourselvesINDIFFERENCEas
bir
a
power—howCOULDyouliveinaccordancewith
böyle
such
indifference?
Tolive—isnotthatjustendeavouringtobeotherwisethanthis
Doğa
Nature
?
Isnotlivingvaluing,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobe
farklı
different
?
Andgrantedthatyourimperative,"living
göre
according
toNature,"meansactuallythe
aynı
same
as"livingaccordingtolife"—howcouldyoudo
Farklı
DIFFERENTLY
?
Whyshouldyoumake
bir
a
principleoutofwhatyouyourselvesare,
ve
and
mustbe?
Inreality,
bununla birlikte
however
,itisquiteotherwisewithyou:
ederken
while
youpretendtoreadwithrapturethecanonofyourlawin
Doğa
Nature
,youwantsomethingquitethecontrary,you
olağanüstü
extraordinary
stage-playersandself-deluders!
Inyourprideyou
istiyorsunuz
wish
todictateyourmorals
ve
and
idealstoNature,to
Doğa
Nature
herself,andtoincorporatethemtherein;
youinsistthatitshallbe
Doğa
Nature
"accordingtotheStoa,"
ve
and
wouldlikeeverythingtobemadeafteryour
kendi
own
image,asavast,
sonsuz
eternal
glorificationandgeneralismofStoicism!
With
tüm
all
yourlovefortruth,youhave
zorladınız
forced
yourselvessolong,sopersistently,
ve
and
withsuchhypnoticrigidityto
görmeye
see
NatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,
o
that
youarenolongerableto
görmeye
see
itotherwise—andtocrown
tüm
all
,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamitehope
o
that
BECAUSEyouareabletotyrannizeoveryourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewillalsoallowherselftobetyrannizedover:
isnottheStoic
bir
a
PARTofNature?...
But
bu
this
isanoldand
sonsuz
everlasting
story:
whathappenedin
eski
old
timeswiththeStoics
hala
still
happenstoday,assoonasever
bir
a
philosophybeginstobelieveinitself.
It
her zaman
always
createstheworldinitsownimage;
itcannotdootherwise;
felsefe
philosophy
isthistyrannicalimpulseitself,the
en
most
spiritualWilltoPower,thewillto"creationoftheworld,"thewilltothecausaprima.
10.
Theeagerness
ve
and
subtlety,Ishouldevensaycraftiness,withwhichtheproblemof"thereal
ve
and
theapparentworld"isdealtwithatpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishes
yiyecek
food
forthoughtandattention;
ve
and
hewhohearsonly
bir
a
"WilltoTruth"inthebackground,
ve
and
nothingelse,cannotcertainlyboastofthesharpestears.
In
nadir
rare
andisolatedcases,it
olabilir
may
reallyhavehappenedthat
böyle
such
aWilltoTruth—a
belirli
certain
extravagantandadventurouspluck,
bir
a
metaphysician'sambitionoftheforlornhope—hasparticipatedtherein:
thatwhichinthe
sonunda
end
alwaysprefersahandfulof"certainty"to
bir
a
wholecartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;
there
olabilir
may
evenbepuritanicalfanaticsof
vicdan
conscience
,whoprefertoputtheir
son
last
trustinasurenothing,ratherthaninan
belirsiz
uncertain
something.
ButthatisNihilism,
ve
and
thesignofadespairing,mortallywearied
ruhun
soul
,notwithstandingthecourageousbearing
böyle
such
avirtuemaydisplay.
It
görünüyor
seems
,however,tobeotherwisewith
güçlü
stronger
andlivelierthinkerswhoare
hala
still
eagerforlife.
Inthattheyside
Karşı
AGAINST
appearance,andspeaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthecredibilityoftheirownbodiesaboutas
düşük
low
asthecredibilityoftheocularevidencethat"theearthstandsstill,"
ve
and
thus,apparently,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurestpossessiontoescape(forwhatdoesoneatpresent
inanıyor
believe
inmorefirmlythaninone'sbody?),—who
biliyor
knows
iftheyarenotreallytryingto
kazanmaya
win
backsomethingwhichwasformerlyanevensecurerpossession,somethingoftheolddomainofthefaithofformertimes,
belki
perhaps
the"immortalsoul,"perhaps"theoldGod,"inshort,ideasbywhichtheycouldlivebetter,thatisto
de
say
,morevigorouslyandmorejoyously,thanby"modernideas"?
Var
There
isDISTRUSTofthese
modern
modern
ideasinthismodeof
bakma
looking
atthings,adisbeliefinallthat
var
has
beenconstructedyesterdayand
bugün
today
;
thereisperhapssome
hafif
slight
admixtureofsatietyandscorn,whichcannolonger
tahammül
endure
theBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthe
en
most
variedorigin,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresent
a
throws
onthemarket;
adisgustofthe
daha
more
refinedtasteatthevillage-fairmotleyness
ve
and
patchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhomthereisnothingeither
yeni
new
ortrue,exceptthismotleyness.
Thereinitseemstomethatweshould
aynı fikirde
agree
withthoseskepticalanti-realists
ve
and
knowledge-microscopistsofthepresentday;
theirinstinct,whichrepelsthemfrom
Modern
MODERN
reality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
bizi
us
!
ThemainthingaboutthemisNOTthattheywishtogo"back,"butthattheywishtogetAWAYtherefrom.
AlittleMOREstrength,swing,
cesaret
courage
,andartisticpower,andthey
olacaktı
would
beOFF—andnotback!
11.
Itseemstomethat
var
there
iseverywhereanattemptatpresenttodivert
dikkat
attention
fromtheactualinfluence
ki
which
KantexercisedonGermanphilosophy,
ve
and
especiallytoignoreprudentlythevalue
ki
which
hesetuponhimself.
Kantwas
öncelikle
first
andforemostproudofhisTableofCategories;
withitinhishandhe
dedi
said
:
"Thisisthemost
zor
difficult
thingthatcouldeverbeundertakenon
adına
behalf
ofmetaphysics."
Letus
sadece
only
understandthis"couldbe"!
Hewas
gurur
proud
ofhavingDISCOVEREDa
yeni
new
facultyinman,thefacultyofsyntheticjudgment
bir
a
priori.
Grantingthathedeceivedhimselfinthis
konuda
matter
;
thedevelopmentandrapidflourishingofGermanphilosophydependedneverthelessonhis
gurur
pride
,andontheeagerrivalryofthe
genç
younger
generationtodiscoverifpossiblesomething—atallevents"newfaculties"—ofwhichtobestillprouder!—Butletusreflectfor
bir
a
moment—itishightimetodoso.
"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kant
soruyor
asks
himself—andwhatisreallyhis
cevabı
answer
?
"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—but
ne yazık ki
unfortunately
notinfivewords,
ama
but
socircumstantially,imposingly,and
ile
with
suchdisplayofGermanprofundity
ve
and
verbalflourishes,thatone
tamamen
altogether
losessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemandeinvolvedin
böyle
such
ananswer.
Peoplewerebesidethemselves
ile
with
delightoverthisnew
fakülte
faculty
,andthejubilationreachedits
doruk
climax
whenKantfurtherdiscovered
bir
a
moralfacultyinman—foratthattimeGermanswere
hala
still
moral,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."
Then
geldi
came
thehoneymoonofGermanphilosophy.
Tüm
All
theyoungtheologiansoftheTubingeninstitution
gittiler
went
immediatelyintothegroves—allseekingfor"faculties."
Ve
And
whatdidtheynotfind—inthat
masum
innocent
,rich,andstillyouthfulperiodoftheGermanspirit,towhichRomanticism,the
kötü niyetli
malicious
fairy,pipedandsang,whenonecouldnot
henüz
yet
distinguishbetween"finding"and"inventing"!
Aboveall
bir
a
facultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristenedit,
entelektüel
intellectual
intuition,andtherebygratifiedthe
en
most
earnestlongingsofthe
doğal
naturally
pious-inclinedGermans.
Onecandono
büyük
greater
wrongtothewholeofthisexuberant
ve
and
eccentricmovement(whichwasreallyyouthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoary
ve
and
senileconceptions),thanto
almak
take
itseriously,oreven
muamele
treat
itwithmoralindignation.
Enough,however—the
dünya
world
grewolder,andthe
rüya
dream
vanished.
Atimecamewhen
insanlar
people
rubbedtheirforeheads,andthey
hala
still
rubthemtoday.
Peoplehadbeendreaming,
ve
and
firstandforemost—oldKant.
"By
demişti
means
ofameans(faculty)"—hehad
demişti
said
,oratleastmeantto
demişti
say
.
But,isthat—ananswer?
Bir
An
explanation?
Orisitnotrather
sadece
merely
arepetitionofthequestion?
Nasıl
How
doesopiuminducesleep?
"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"
yani
namely
thevirtusdormitiva,repliesthedoctorinMoliere,.
Ama
But
suchrepliesbelongtotherealmof
komedi
comedy
,anditishightimetoreplacetheKantianquestion,"Howaresyntheticjudgments
bir
a
PRIORIpossible?"
byanotherquestion,"Whyisbeliefinsuchjudgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishightimethatweshouldunderstandthatsuchjudgmentsmustbebelievedtobe
doğru
true
,forthesakeofthe
korunması
preservation
ofcreatureslikeourselves;
thoughtheystill
olabilir
might
naturallybefalsejudgments!
Ya da
Or
,moreplainlyspoken,and
kabaca
roughly
andreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriorishouldnot"bepossible"atall;
wehave
yok
no
righttothem;
inourmouthstheyarenothingbutfalsejudgments.
Sadece
Only
,ofcourse,thebeliefintheirtruthisnecessary,as
inandırıcı
plausible
beliefandocularevidencebelongingtothe
perspektif
perspective
viewoflife.
Andfinally,tocalltomindthe
muazzam
enormous
influencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
umarım
hope
youunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughoutthe
tüm
whole
ofEurope,thereisnodoubtthat
bir
a
certainVIRTUSDORMITIVAhad
bir
a
shareinit;
thankstoGermanphilosophy,itwasadelighttothe
asil
noble
idlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
ve
and
thepoliticalobscurantistsof
tüm
all
nations,tofindan
panzehir
antidote
tothestilloverwhelmingsensualismwhichoverflowedfromthe
geçen
last
centuryintothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...