PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthisawoman—whatthen?
Istherenotgroundforsuspectingthat
все
allphilosophers,insofarastheyhavebeendogmatists,havefailedtoпонять
understandwomen—thattheterribleseriousnessи
andclumsyimportunitywithwhichtheyhaveобычно
usuallypaidtheiraddressestoTruth,havebeenunskilledи
andunseemlymethodsforwinningawoman?Конечно
Certainlyshehasneverallowedherselftobewon;и
andatpresenteverykindofdogmastandsс
withsadanddiscouragedmien—IF,действительно
indeed,itstandsatall!For
есть
therearescofferswhomaintainthatithasfallen,thatвсе
alldogmaliesontheground—nayболее
more,thatitisatitslastgasp.Но
Buttospeakseriously,therearegoodgroundsforhopingthatвсе
alldogmatizinginphilosophy,whateversolemn,whateverconclusiveи
anddecidedairsithasassumed,может
mayhavebeenonlyanoblepuerilismи
andtyronism;andprobablythe
время
timeisathandwhenitбудет
willbeonceandagainunderstoodWHAThasactuallysufficedforthebasisofsuchimposingи
andabsolutephilosophicaledificesasthedogmatistshavehithertoreared:возможно
perhapssomepopularsuperstitionofimmemorialtime(suchasthesoul-superstition,which,intheformofsubject-и
andego-superstition,hasnotyetceaseddoingmischief):возможно
perhapssomeplayuponwords,aобман
deceptiononthepartofграмматики
grammar,oranaudaciousgeneralizationofочень
veryrestricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.The
философия
philosophyofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,wasтолько
onlyapromiseforthousandsofyearsпозже
afterwards,aswasastrologyinдо сих пор
stillearliertimes,intheserviceofwhichвероятно
probablymorelabour,gold,acuteness,и
andpatiencehavebeenspentчем
thanonanyactualsciencehitherto:we
обязаны
owetoit,andtoits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsiaи
andEgypt,thegrandstyleofarchitecture.Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesuponthe
сердце
heartofhumanitywitheverlastingclaims,все
allgreatthingshavefirsttoблуждать
wanderabouttheearthasогромные
enormousandawe-inspiringcaricatures:dogmatic
философия
philosophyhasbeenacaricatureofthiskind—forinstance,theVedantaдоктрина
doctrineinAsia,andPlatonisminЕвропе
Europe.Letusnotbeungratefultoit,althoughitmust
безусловно
certainlybeconfessedthattheworst,themosttiresome,и
andthemostdangerousoferrorshithertohasbeenadogmatisterror—namely,Plato'sизобретение
inventionofPureSpiritandtheGoodinItself.Но
Butnowwhenithasbeensurmounted,когда
whenEurope,ridofthisnightmare,может
canagaindrawbreathfreelyи
andatleastenjoyahealthier—sleep,мы
we,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsofalltheсилы
strengthwhichthestruggleagainstthiserrorhasfostered.Itamountedtotheveryinversionof
истины
truth,andthedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—thefundamentalcondition—ofжизни
life,tospeakofSpiritи
andtheGoodasPlatospokeofних
them;indeedonemightask,asaphysician:
"Howdidsuchamalady
напасть
attackthatfinestproductofantiquity,Plato?HadthewickedSocrates
действительно
reallycorruptedhim?WasSocratesafterall
в
acorrupterofyouths,anddeservedhishemlock?"Но
ButthestruggleagainstPlato,or—tospeakplainer,и
andforthe"people"—thestruggleпротив
againsttheecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsofChristianity(FORCHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFORTHE"PEOPLE"),producedinЕвропе
Europeamagnificenttensionofдуши
soul,suchashadnotexistedнигде
anywherepreviously;withsuchatenselystrainedbowonecan
теперь
nowaimatthefurthestgoals.Asamatteroffact,theEuropeanfeels
это
thistensionasastateofбедствия
distress,andtwiceattemptshavebeenmadeingrandstyletounbendtheлук
bow:oncebymeansofJesuitism,
и
andthesecondtimebymeansofdemocraticenlightenment—which,с
withtheaidoflibertyofthepressи
andnewspaper-reading,might,infact,bringitaboutчто
thatthespiritwouldnotsoлегко
easilyfinditselfin"distress"!(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—allcreditto
них
them!buttheyagainmadethingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
Но
Butwe,whoareneitherJesuits,nordemocrats,norдаже
evensufficientlyGermans,weGOODEUROPEANS,и
andfree,VERYfreespirits—wehaveitвсе еще
still,allthedistressofspiritи
andallthetensionofitsbow!И
Andperhapsalsothearrow,theдолг
duty,and,whoknows?THEGOALTOAIMAT....
CHAPTERI.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
TheWilltoTruth,whichistotemptustomanyahazardousenterprise,thefamousTruthfulnessofwhich
все
allphilosophershavehithertospokenс
withrespect,whatquestionshasэта
thisWilltoTruthnotlaidперед
beforeus!Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itis
уже
alreadyalongstory;yetitseemsasifitwere
едва
hardlycommenced.Isitanywonderifweatlastgrowdistrustful,lose
терпение
patience,andturnimpatientlyaway?Что
ThatthisSphinxteachesusatlasttoaskquestionsourselves?Кто
WHOisitreallythatputsquestionstoushere?WHAT
самом деле
reallyisthis"WilltoTruth"inнас
us?Infactwemadea
долго
longhaltatthequestionastotheoriginofthisWill—untilatlastwecametoanабсолютной
absolutestandstillbeforeayetmorefundamentalquestion.Weinquired
о
abouttheVALUEofthisWill.Granted
что
thatwewantthetruth:Почему
WHYNOTRATHERuntruth?Anduncertainty?
Даже
Evenignorance?Theproblemofthevalueof
истины
truthpresenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwewhopresentedourselvesперед
beforetheproblem?WhichofusistheOedipus
здесь
here?WhichtheSphinx?
Itwould
похоже
seemtobearendezvousofquestionsи
andnotesofinterrogation.Andcoulditbebelieved
что
thatitatlastseemstousasiftheпроблема
problemhadneverbeenpropoundedраньше
before,asifwewerethefirsttodiscernit,getasightofit,и
andRISKRAISINGit?For
есть
thereisriskinraisingего
it,perhapsthereisnogreaterриск
risk.2.
"HOWCOULDanythingoriginateoutofitsopposite?
For
например
example,truthoutoferror?или
ortheWilltoTruthoutofthewilltodeception?или
orthegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?или
orthepuresun-brightvisionofthewisemanoutofcovetousness?Такой
Suchgenesisisimpossible;whoeverdreamsofitisafool,
нет
nay,worsethanafool;thingsofthehighestvaluemust
иметь
haveadifferentorigin,anпроисхождение
originofTHEIRown—inthistransitory,seductive,illusory,paltryмире
world,inthisturmoilofdelusionи
andcupidity,theycannothavetheirsource.Но
ButratherinthelapofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealedGod,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THEREmustbetheirисточник
source,andnowhereelse!"—Thismodeofreasoningdisclosesthetypicalprejudicebywhichmetaphysiciansofalltimescanberecognized,этот
thismodeofvaluationisatthebackofalltheirlogicalпроцедуры
procedure;throughthis"belief"oftheirs,theyexertthemselvesfortheir"knowledge,"for
то
somethingthatisintheendторжественно
solemnlychristened"theTruth."Thefundamental
вера
beliefofmetaphysiciansisTHEВера
BELIEFINANTITHESESOFVALUES.Itneveroccurred
даже
eventothewariestofthemtoсомневаться
doubthereontheverythreshold(whereсомневаться
doubt,however,wasmostnecessary);thoughtheyhadmadeasolemn
обет
vow,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."Foritmaybedoubted,firstly,
ли
whetherantithesesexistatall;и
andsecondly,whetherthepopularvaluationsи
andantithesesofvalueuponчто
whichmetaphysicianshavesettheirпечать
seal,arenotperhapsmerelysuperficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,besidesbeingprobablymadefromsomecorner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,toзаимствовать
borrowanexpressioncurrentamongpainters.In
несмотря
spiteofallthevaluewhichmayпринадлежать
belongtothetrue,thepositive,и
andtheunselfish,itmightbeвозможно
possiblethatahigherandболее
morefundamentalvalueforlifegenerallyshouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,toselfishness,и
andcupidity.Itmightevenbe
возможно
possiblethatWHATconstitutestheценность
valueofthosegoodandrespectedthings,consistsименно
preciselyintheirbeinginsidiouslyсвязаны
related,knotted,andcrochetedtotheseevilи
andapparentlyopposedthings—perhapseveninbeingпо существу
essentiallyidenticalwiththem.Perhaps!
Но
Butwhowishestoconcernhimselfwithsuchdangerous"Perhapses"!For
которые
thatinvestigationonemustawaittheadventofaneworderofphilosophers,suchaswillиметь
haveothertastesandinclinations,thereverseofтех
thosehithertoprevalent—philosophersofthedangerous"Perhaps"ineverysenseoftheterm.И
Andtospeakinallseriousness,Iвижу
seesuchnewphilosophersbeginningtoappear.3.
Havingkeptasharpeyeonphilosophers,
и
andhavingreadbetweentheirlinesдолго
longenough,Inowsaytomyselfthatthegreaterчасть
partofconsciousthinkingmustbecountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,и
anditissoevenintheслучае
caseofphilosophicalthinking;onehas
здесь
heretolearnanew,asonelearnedanewо
aboutheredityand"innateness."As
мало
littleastheactofbirthcomesintoвнимание
considerationinthewholeprocessи
andprocedureofheredity,justasмало
littleis"being-conscious"OPPOSEDtotheinstinctiveinanydecisiveсмысле
sense;thegreaterpartoftheconsciousthinkingofaphilosopheris
тайно
secretlyinfluencedbyhisinstincts,и
andforcedintodefinitechannels.И
Andbehindalllogicanditsseemingsovereigntyofmovement,therearevaluations,или
ortospeakmoreplainly,physiologicaldemands,fortheподдержания
maintenanceofadefinitemodeofжизни
lifeForexample,thatthecertainisстоит
worthmorethantheuncertain,что
thatillusionislessvaluableчем
than"truth"suchvaluations,inнесмотря
spiteoftheirregulativeimportanceforНас
US,mightnotwithstandingbeonlysuperficialvaluations,specialkindsofniaiserie,такие
suchasmaybenecessaryfortheподдержания
maintenanceofbeingssuchasourselves.Supposing,ineffect,thatmanisnot
просто
justthe"measureofthings."4.
Thefalsenessofanopinionisnotforusanyobjectiontoit:
itis
здесь
here,perhaps,thatournewязык
languagesoundsmoststrangely.The
вопрос
questionis,howfaranмнение
opinionislife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,возможно
perhapsspecies-rearing,andwearefundamentallyinclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions(towhichthesyntheticjudgmentsaprioriпринадлежат
belong),arethemostindispensabletoнас
us,thatwithoutarecognitionofлогических
logicalfictions,withoutacomparisonofrealityс
withthepurelyIMAGINEDworldoftheabsoluteи
andimmutable,withoutaconstantcounterfeitingoftheworldbymeansofnumbers,mancouldnotlive—thattherenunciationoffalseopinionswouldbearenunciationofжизни
life,anegationoflife.TO
Признать
RECOGNISEUNTRUTHASACONDITIONOFЖизни
LIFE;thatiscertainlytoimpugnthe
традиционные
traditionalideasofvalueinadangerousобразом
manner,andaphilosophywhichventurestoсделать
doso,hastherebyaloneplaceditselfbeyondgoodи
andevil.5.
Thatwhichcausesphilosopherstoberegardedhalf-distrustfully
и
andhalf-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeatedоткрытие
discoveryhowinnocenttheyare—howчасто
oftenandeasilytheymakemistakesи
andlosetheirway,inshort,как
howchildishandchildliketheyare,—butthatthereisnotenoughhonestdealingс
withthem,whereastheyallraiseaгромкий
loudandvirtuousoutcrywhentheпроблема
problemoftruthfulnessisevenhintedatintheremotestmanner.They
все
allposeasthoughtheirrealopinionshadbeendiscoveredи
andattainedthroughtheself-evolvingofaхолодной
cold,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(inотличие
contrasttoallsortsofmystics,которые
who,fairerandfoolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,inсамом деле
fact,aprejudicedproposition,idea,или
or"suggestion,"whichisgenerallytheirheart'sdesireabstractedи
andrefined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtoutпосле
aftertheevent.Theyare
все
alladvocateswhodonotwishtoberegardedassuch,обычно
generallyastutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,whichtheydub"truths,"—andОчень
VERYfarfromhavingtheсовести
consciencewhichbravelyadmitsthistoitself,очень
veryfarfromhavingthegoodtasteofthecouragewhichgoessoдалеко
farastoletthisbeunderstood,возможно
perhapstowarnfriendorfoe,или
orincheerfulconfidenceandself-ridicule.ThespectacleoftheTartufferyofoldKant,
одинаково
equallystiffanddecent,withwhichheenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthatведут
lead(morecorrectlymislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousonesулыбаться
smile,wewhofindnosmallamusementinspyingoutthesubtletricksofoldmoralistsи
andethicalpreachers.Or,stillmoreso,thehocus-pocusinmathematicalform,bymeansofwhichSpinozahas,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyinmail
и
andmask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"toперевести
translatethetermfairlyandsquarely—inordertherebytostrikeужас
terroratonceintotheсердце
heartoftheassailantwhoshoulddaretocastaвзгляд
glanceonthatinvinciblemaiden,thatPallasAthene:—howmuchofpersonaltimidityи
andvulnerabilitydoesthismasqueradeofasicklyreclusebetray!6.
Ithasgraduallybecome
ясно
cleartomewhateverygreatфилософия
philosophyuptillnowhasconsistedof—namely,theисповедь
confessionofitsoriginator,andaspeciesofinvoluntaryи
andunconsciousauto-biography;andmoreoverthatthemoral(orimmoral)
цель
purposeineveryphilosophyhasconstitutedthetruevitalgermoutofwhichtheentireрастение
planthasalwaysgrown.Indeed,to
понять
understandhowtheabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsofaphilosopherhavebeenarrivedat,itisвсегда
alwayswell(andwise)toсначала
firstaskoneself:"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Accordingly,Idonot
верю
believethatan"impulsetoknowledge"isthefatherofphilosophy;но
butthatanotherimpulse,hereasдругих
elsewhere,hasonlymadeuseofзнание
knowledge(andmistakenknowledge!)as
в
aninstrument.Butwhoeverconsidersthefundamentalimpulsesofman
с
withaviewtodetermininghowfartheyмогут
mayhavehereactedasINSPIRINGGENIIИли
(orasdemonsandcobolds),willfindчто
thattheyhaveallpracticedphilosophyatoneвремя
timeoranother,andthatкаждый
eachoneofthemwouldhavebeenonlytoogladtolookuponitselfastheultimateendofexistenceи
andthelegitimateLORDoverвсе
alltheotherimpulses.For
каждый
everyimpulseisimperious,andasТакой
SUCH,attemptstophilosophize.Tobe
конечно
sure,inthecaseofscholars,intheслучае
caseofreallyscientificmen,itможет
maybeotherwise—"better,"ifyouwill;там
theretheremayreallybesuchaвещь
thingasan"impulsetoknowledge,"somekindofнебольшой
small,independentclock-work,which,whenхорошо
wellwoundup,worksawayindustriouslytothatend,WITHOUTtherestofthescholarlyimpulsestakinganymaterialparttherein.The
фактические
actual"interests"ofthescholar,следовательно
therefore,aregenerallyinquiteanotherdirection—inthefamily,возможно
perhaps,orinmoney-making,orinpolitics;it
находится
is,infact,almostindifferentatwhatpointofисследования
researchhislittlemachineisplaced,и
andwhetherthehopefulyoungработник
workerbecomesagoodphilologist,amushroomspecialist,или
orachemist;heisnotCHARACTERISEDbybecomingthis
или
orthat.Inthephilosopher,onthe
напротив
contrary,thereisabsolutelynothingimpersonal;и
andaboveall,hismoralityfurnishesadecidedи
anddecisivetestimonyastoКто
WHOHEIS,—thatistosay,inwhatorderthedeepestimpulsesofhisnaturestandtoдруг
eachother.7.
Howmaliciousphilosophers
могут
canbe!Iknowof
ничего
nothingmorestingingthantheшутка
jokeEpicurustookthelibertyofmakingonPlatoи
andthePlatonists;hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Initsoriginal
смысле
sense,andonthefaceofit,thewordsignifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessoriesи
andlick-spittles;besidesthis,however,itisasmuchasto
сказать
say,"TheyareallACTORS,thereisничего
nothinggenuineaboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwasapopularnameforanactor).И
Andthelatterisreallythemalignantreproachэто
thatEpicuruscastuponPlato:hewasannoyedbythegrandiosemanner,themiseenscenestyleofwhichPlato
и
andhisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnotamaster!Он
He,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,whosatconcealedinhislittlegardenatAthens,и
andwrotethreehundredbooks,возможно
perhapsoutofrageandambitiousзависти
envyofPlato,whoknows!Greecetooka
сто
hundredyearstofindoutкто
whothegarden-godEpicurusreallywas.Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Есть
Thereisapointineveryphilosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthephilosopherappearsonthescene;или
or,toputitinthewordsofanancientmystery:.Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
Youdesireto
Жить
LIVE"accordingtoNature"?Oh,younobleStoics,what
обман
fraudofwords!ImaginetoyourselvesabeinglikeNature,boundlesslyextravagant,boundlesslyindifferent,withoutpurpose
или
orconsideration,withoutpityorсправедливости
justice,atoncefruitfulandbarrenи
anduncertain:imaginetoyourselves
Безразличие
INDIFFERENCEasapower—howCOULDyouжить
liveinaccordancewithsuchбезразличие
indifference?Tolive—isnotthat
просто
justendeavouringtobeotherwiseчем
thanthisNature?Isnotlivingvaluing,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobedifferent?
И
Andgrantedthatyourimperative,"livingсоответствии
accordingtoNature,"meansactuallythesameas"livingсоответствии
accordingtolife"—howcouldyoudoDIFFERENTLY?Почему
Whyshouldyoumakeaпринцип
principleoutofwhatyouyourselvesare,и
andmustbe?Inreality,however,itis
совсем
quiteotherwisewithyou:whileyoupretendtoread
с
withrapturethecanonofyourlawinNature,youхотите
wantsomethingquitethecontrary,youextraordinarystage-playersи
andself-deluders!Inyourprideyou
хотите
wishtodictateyourmoralsи
andidealstoNature,toNatureherself,и
andtoincorporatethemtherein;youinsistthatitshallbe
Природа
Nature"accordingtotheStoa,"и
andwouldlikeeverythingtobemadeafteryourownimage,asavast,eternalglorificationи
andgeneralismofStoicism!With
все
allyourlovefortruth,youесть
haveforcedyourselvessolong,sopersistently,и
andwithsuchhypnoticrigiditytoвидеть
seeNatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,thatyouareне
nolongerabletoseeitotherwise—andtocrownвсе
all,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamitehopethatПотому что
BECAUSEyouareabletotyrannizeoveryourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewillтакже
alsoallowherselftobetyrannizedover:isnottheStoica
Частью
PARTofNature?...Butthisisanold
и
andeverlastingstory:whathappenedinoldtimes
со
withtheStoicsstillhappensсегодня
today,assoonaseveraфилософия
philosophybeginstobelieveinitself.It
всегда
alwayscreatestheworldinitsownimage;itcannotdo
иначе
otherwise;philosophyisthistyrannical
импульс
impulseitself,themostspiritualWilltoВласти
Power,thewillto"creationoftheworld,"thewilltothecausaprima.10.
Theeagerness
и
andsubtlety,Ishouldevensaycraftiness,с
withwhichtheproblemof"therealи
andtheapparentworld"isdealtс
withatpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishesfoodforthoughtи
andattention;andhewhohears
только
onlya"WilltoTruth"intheзаднем плане
background,andnothingelse,cannotcertainlyпохвастаться
boastofthesharpestears.In
редких
rareandisolatedcases,itmayдействительно
reallyhavehappenedthatsuchaWilltoTruth—acertainextravagantи
andadventurouspluck,ametaphysician'sамбиция
ambitionoftheforlornhope—hasparticipatedtherein:thatwhichintheend
всегда
alwaysprefersahandfulof"certainty"toawholecartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;there
могут
mayevenbepuritanicalfanaticsofсовести
conscience,whoprefertoputtheirlasttrustinasureничего
nothing,ratherthaninanuncertainто
something.ButthatisNihilism,
и
andthesignofadespairing,mortallyweariedдуши
soul,notwithstandingthecourageousbearingsuchaдобродетель
virtuemaydisplay.Itseems,however,tobeotherwise
с
withstrongerandlivelierthinkersкоторые
whoarestilleagerforжизни
life.InthattheysideAGAINSTappearance,
и
andspeaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthecredibilityoftheirownbodiesо
aboutaslowasthecredibilityoftheocularevidencethat"theearthstandsstill,"и
andthus,apparently,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurestpossessiontoубежать
escape(forwhatdoesoneatpresentbelieveinmoreтвердо
firmlythaninone'sbody?),—whoknowsiftheyarenotдействительно
reallytryingtowinbackто
somethingwhichwasformerlyanevensecurerpossession,то
somethingoftheolddomainofthefaithofformertimes,возможно
perhapsthe"immortalsoul,"perhaps"theoldGod,"inshort,ideasbywhichtheycouldжить
livebetter,thatistoговорят
say,morevigorouslyandmorejoyously,чем
thanby"modernideas"?ThereisDISTRUSTofthesemodernideasinthismodeoflookingatthings,adisbeliefinall
что
thathasbeenconstructedyesterdayи
andtoday;thereisperhapssomeslightadmixtureofsatiety
и
andscorn,whichcannolongerтерпеть
enduretheBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthemostvariedпроисхождения
origin,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresentthrowsontheрынок
market;adisgustofthe
более
morerefinedtasteatthevillage-fairmotleynessи
andpatchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhomthereisничего
nothingeithernewortrue,кроме
exceptthismotleyness.Thereinitseemstomethatweshouldagree
с
withthoseskepticalanti-realistsandknowledge-microscopistsofthepresentдня
day;theirinstinct,whichrepelsthemfromMODERNreality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
нас
us!ThemainthingaboutthemisNOT
что
thattheywishtogo"back,"butчто
thattheywishtogetAWAYtherefrom.A
немного
littleMOREstrength,swing,courage,и
andartisticpower,andtheywouldbeOFF—andnotback!11.
Itseemstomethatthereis
повсюду
everywhereanattemptatpresenttoотвлечь
divertattentionfromtheactualinfluencewhichKantexercisedonGermanphilosophy,и
andespeciallytoignoreprudentlytheценность
valuewhichhesetuponhimself.Kantwasfirstand
первую очередь
foremostproudofhisTableofCategories;с
withitinhishandhesaid:"Thisisthemostdifficult
вещь
thingthatcouldeverbeundertakenonимени
behalfofmetaphysics."Letusonlyunderstand
это
this"couldbe"!HewasproudofhavingDISCOVEREDanewfacultyinman,thefacultyofsyntheticjudgmentapriori.
Granting
что
thathedeceivedhimselfinthismatter;the
развитие
developmentandrapidflourishingofGermanphilosophydependedтем не менее
neverthelessonhispride,andontheeagerrivalryoftheyoungerпоколения
generationtodiscoverifpossiblesomething—atallevents"newfaculties"—ofчто
whichtobestillprouder!—Butletusreflectforamoment—itishightimetodoso."HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kantaskshimself—andwhatis
самом деле
reallyhisanswer?"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—but
к сожалению
unfortunatelynotinfivewords,но
butsocircumstantially,imposingly,andс
withsuchdisplayofGermanprofundityи
andverbalflourishes,thatonealtogetherlosessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemandeinvolvedinтакой
suchananswer.Peoplewerebesidethemselveswithdelightoverthisnewfaculty,
и
andthejubilationreacheditsапогея
climaxwhenKantfurtherdiscoveredamoralfacultyinman—foratчто
thattimeGermanswerestillmoral,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."Thencamethe
медовый месяц
honeymoonofGermanphilosophy.All
в
theyoungtheologiansoftheTubingeninstitutionwentнемедленно
immediatelyintothegroves—allseekingfor"faculties."И
Andwhatdidtheynotfind—inthatinnocent,rich,и
andstillyouthfulperiodoftheGermanspirit,towhichRomanticism,themaliciousфея
fairy,pipedandsang,whenonecouldnotyetотличить
distinguishbetween"finding"and"inventing"!Aboveallafacultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristened
его
it,intellectualintuition,andtherebygratifiedthemostearnestlongingsoftheестественно
naturallypious-inclinedGermans.Onecandonogreaterwrongtothewholeofthisexuberant
и
andeccentricmovement(whichwasсамом деле
reallyyouthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoaryи
andsenileconceptions),thantotakeitвсерьез
seriously,oreventreatitс
withmoralindignation.Enough,however—the
мир
worldgrewolder,andtheмечта
dreamvanished.Atimecame
когда
whenpeoplerubbedtheirforeheads,и
andtheystillrubthemtoday.Люди
Peoplehadbeendreaming,andfirstи
andforemost—oldKant."Bymeansofameans(faculty)"—hehadsaid,
или
oratleastmeanttoсказать
say.But,isthat—ananswer?
An
объяснение
explanation?Orisitnotrathermerelyarepetitionofthequestion?
Как
Howdoesopiuminducesleep?"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"
именно
namelythevirtusdormitiva,repliestheдоктор
doctorinMoliere,.Butsuchreplies
принадлежат
belongtotherealmofcomedy,и
anditishightimetoзаменить
replacetheKantianquestion,"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaPRIORIpossible?"byanotherquestion,"Whyis
вера
beliefinsuchjudgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishighвремя
timethatweshouldunderstandчто
thatsuchjudgmentsmustbebelievedtobetrue,fortheради
sakeofthepreservationofcreatureslikeourselves;thoughthey
все еще
stillmightnaturallybefalsejudgments!Или
Or,moreplainlyspoken,andгрубо
roughlyandreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriorishouldnot"bepossible"atall;wehave
не
norighttothem;inourmouthstheyarenothingbutfalsejudgments.
Только
Only,ofcourse,thebeliefintheirtruthisnecessary,asplausibleвера
beliefandocularevidencebelongingtotheperspectiveviewofжизнь
life.Andfinally,tocalltomindtheenormousinfluencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
надеюсь
hopeyouunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughouttheвсю
wholeofEurope,thereisнет
nodoubtthatacertainVIRTUSDORMITIVAhadashareinit;thankstoGermanphilosophy,itwasadelighttothenobleidlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
и
andthepoliticalobscurantistsofвсе
allnations,tofindanпротивоядие
antidotetothestilloverwhelmingsensualismwhichoverflowedfromthelastвека
centuryintothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...