Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Russian A1-B2 Students

Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Russian A1-B2 Students

Unlock the potential of this modern translation approach, designed to enhance your language learning experience. By allowing you to choose your difficulty level, it guarantees a personalized challenge that's suited to your progress. This method promotes comprehension by encouraging you to infer the meaning of new words from context, rather than relying heavily on direct translations. Though some translations are obscured to stimulate guessing, it's perfectly fine to consult a dictionary when needed. This technique combines challenge and support, making language learning fun and effective. Explore these translated classics to enjoy literature while advancing your language skills.

PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthisawoman—whatthen?
Istherenotgroundforsuspectingthat
все
all
philosophers,insofarastheyhavebeendogmatists,havefailedto
понять
understand
women—thattheterribleseriousness
и
and
clumsyimportunitywithwhichtheyhave
обычно
usually
paidtheiraddressestoTruth,havebeenunskilled
и
and
unseemlymethodsforwinningawoman?
Конечно
Certainly
shehasneverallowedherselftobewon;
и
and
atpresenteverykindofdogmastands
с
with
sadanddiscouragedmien—IF,
действительно
indeed
,itstandsatall!
For
есть
there
arescofferswhomaintainthatithasfallen,that
все
all
dogmaliesontheground—nay
более
more
,thatitisatitslastgasp.
Но
But
tospeakseriously,therearegoodgroundsforhopingthat
все
all
dogmatizinginphilosophy,whateversolemn,whateverconclusive
и
and
decidedairsithasassumed,
может
may
havebeenonlyanoblepuerilism
и
and
tyronism;
andprobablythe
время
time
isathandwhenit
будет
will
beonceandagainunderstoodWHAThasactuallysufficedforthebasisofsuchimposing
и
and
absolutephilosophicaledificesasthedogmatistshavehithertoreared:
возможно
perhaps
somepopularsuperstitionofimmemorialtime(suchasthesoul-superstition,which,intheformofsubject-
и
and
ego-superstition,hasnotyetceaseddoingmischief):
возможно
perhaps
someplayuponwords,a
обман
deception
onthepartof
грамматики
grammar
,oranaudaciousgeneralizationof
очень
very
restricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.
The
философия
philosophy
ofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,was
только
only
apromiseforthousandsofyears
позже
afterwards
,aswasastrologyin
до сих пор
still
earliertimes,intheserviceofwhich
вероятно
probably
morelabour,gold,acuteness,
и
and
patiencehavebeenspent
чем
than
onanyactualsciencehitherto:
we
обязаны
owe
toit,andtoits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsia
и
and
Egypt,thegrandstyleofarchitecture.
Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesuponthe
сердце
heart
ofhumanitywitheverlastingclaims,
все
all
greatthingshavefirstto
блуждать
wander
abouttheearthas
огромные
enormous
andawe-inspiringcaricatures:
dogmatic
философия
philosophy
hasbeenacaricatureofthiskind—forinstance,theVedanta
доктрина
doctrine
inAsia,andPlatonismin
Европе
Europe
.
Letusnotbeungratefultoit,althoughitmust
безусловно
certainly
beconfessedthattheworst,themosttiresome,
и
and
themostdangerousoferrorshithertohasbeenadogmatisterror—namely,Plato's
изобретение
invention
ofPureSpiritandtheGoodinItself.
Но
But
nowwhenithasbeensurmounted,
когда
when
Europe,ridofthisnightmare,
может
can
againdrawbreathfreely
и
and
atleastenjoyahealthier—sleep,
мы
we
,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsofallthe
силы
strength
whichthestruggleagainstthiserrorhasfostered.
Itamountedtotheveryinversionof
истины
truth
,andthedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—thefundamentalcondition—of
жизни
life
,tospeakofSpirit
и
and
theGoodasPlatospokeof
них
them
;
indeedonemightask,asaphysician:
"Howdidsuchamalady
напасть
attack
thatfinestproductofantiquity,Plato?
HadthewickedSocrates
действительно
really
corruptedhim?
WasSocratesafterall
в
a
corrupterofyouths,anddeservedhishemlock?"
Но
But
thestruggleagainstPlato,or—tospeakplainer,
и
and
forthe"people"—thestruggle
против
against
theecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsofChristianity(FORCHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFORTHE"PEOPLE"),producedin
Европе
Europe
amagnificenttensionof
души
soul
,suchashadnotexisted
нигде
anywhere
previously;
withsuchatenselystrainedbowonecan
теперь
now
aimatthefurthestgoals.
Asamatteroffact,theEuropeanfeels
это
this
tensionasastateof
бедствия
distress
,andtwiceattemptshavebeenmadeingrandstyletounbendthe
лук
bow
:
oncebymeansofJesuitism,
и
and
thesecondtimebymeansofdemocraticenlightenment—which,
с
with
theaidoflibertyofthepress
и
and
newspaper-reading,might,infact,bringitabout
что
that
thespiritwouldnotso
легко
easily
finditselfin"distress"!
(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—allcreditto
них
them
!
buttheyagainmadethingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
Но
But
we,whoareneitherJesuits,nordemocrats,nor
даже
even
sufficientlyGermans,weGOODEUROPEANS,
и
and
free,VERYfreespirits—wehaveit
все еще
still
,allthedistressofspirit
и
and
allthetensionofitsbow!
И
And
perhapsalsothearrow,the
долг
duty
,and,whoknows?
THEGOALTOAIMAT....
CHAPTERI.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
TheWilltoTruth,whichistotemptustomanyahazardousenterprise,thefamousTruthfulnessofwhich
все
all
philosophershavehithertospoken
с
with
respect,whatquestionshas
эта
this
WilltoTruthnotlaid
перед
before
us!
Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itis
уже
already
alongstory;
yetitseemsasifitwere
едва
hardly
commenced.
Isitanywonderifweatlastgrowdistrustful,lose
терпение
patience
,andturnimpatientlyaway?
Что
That
thisSphinxteachesusatlasttoaskquestionsourselves?
Кто
WHO
isitreallythatputsquestionstoushere?
WHAT
самом деле
really
isthis"WilltoTruth"in
нас
us
?
Infactwemadea
долго
long
haltatthequestionastotheoriginofthisWill—untilatlastwecametoan
абсолютной
absolute
standstillbeforeayetmorefundamentalquestion.
Weinquired
о
about
theVALUEofthisWill.
Granted
что
that
wewantthetruth:
Почему
WHY
NOTRATHERuntruth?
Anduncertainty?
Даже
Even
ignorance?
Theproblemofthevalueof
истины
truth
presenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwewhopresentedourselves
перед
before
theproblem?
WhichofusistheOedipus
здесь
here
?
WhichtheSphinx?
Itwould
похоже
seem
tobearendezvousofquestions
и
and
notesofinterrogation.
Andcoulditbebelieved
что
that
itatlastseemstousasifthe
проблема
problem
hadneverbeenpropounded
раньше
before
,asifwewerethefirsttodiscernit,getasightofit,
и
and
RISKRAISINGit?
For
есть
there
isriskinraising
его
it
,perhapsthereisnogreater
риск
risk
.
2.
"HOWCOULDanythingoriginateoutofitsopposite?
For
например
example
,truthoutoferror?
или
or
theWilltoTruthoutofthewilltodeception?
или
or
thegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?
или
or
thepuresun-brightvisionofthewisemanoutofcovetousness?
Такой
Such
genesisisimpossible;
whoeverdreamsofitisafool,
нет
nay
,worsethanafool;
thingsofthehighestvaluemust
иметь
have
adifferentorigin,an
происхождение
origin
ofTHEIRown—inthistransitory,seductive,illusory,paltry
мире
world
,inthisturmoilofdelusion
и
and
cupidity,theycannothavetheirsource.
Но
But
ratherinthelapofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealedGod,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THEREmustbetheir
источник
source
,andnowhereelse!"—Thismodeofreasoningdisclosesthetypicalprejudicebywhichmetaphysiciansofalltimescanberecognized,
этот
this
modeofvaluationisatthebackofalltheirlogical
процедуры
procedure
;
throughthis"belief"oftheirs,theyexertthemselvesfortheir"knowledge,"for
то
something
thatisintheend
торжественно
solemnly
christened"theTruth."
Thefundamental
вера
belief
ofmetaphysiciansisTHE
Вера
BELIEF
INANTITHESESOFVALUES.
Itneveroccurred
даже
even
tothewariestofthemto
сомневаться
doubt
hereontheverythreshold(where
сомневаться
doubt
,however,wasmostnecessary);
thoughtheyhadmadeasolemn
обет
vow
,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."
Foritmaybedoubted,firstly,
ли
whether
antithesesexistatall;
и
and
secondly,whetherthepopularvaluations
и
and
antithesesofvalueupon
что
which
metaphysicianshavesettheir
печать
seal
,arenotperhapsmerelysuperficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,besidesbeingprobablymadefromsomecorner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,to
заимствовать
borrow
anexpressioncurrentamongpainters.
In
несмотря
spite
ofallthevaluewhichmay
принадлежать
belong
tothetrue,thepositive,
и
and
theunselfish,itmightbe
возможно
possible
thatahigherand
более
more
fundamentalvalueforlifegenerallyshouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,toselfishness,
и
and
cupidity.
Itmightevenbe
возможно
possible
thatWHATconstitutesthe
ценность
value
ofthosegoodandrespectedthings,consists
именно
precisely
intheirbeinginsidiously
связаны
related
,knotted,andcrochetedtotheseevil
и
and
apparentlyopposedthings—perhapseveninbeing
по существу
essentially
identicalwiththem.
Perhaps!
Но
But
whowishestoconcernhimselfwithsuchdangerous"Perhapses"!
For
которые
that
investigationonemustawaittheadventofaneworderofphilosophers,suchaswill
иметь
have
othertastesandinclinations,thereverseof
тех
those
hithertoprevalent—philosophersofthedangerous"Perhaps"ineverysenseoftheterm.
И
And
tospeakinallseriousness,I
вижу
see
suchnewphilosophersbeginningtoappear.
3.
Havingkeptasharpeyeonphilosophers,
и
and
havingreadbetweentheirlines
долго
long
enough,Inowsaytomyselfthatthegreater
часть
part
ofconsciousthinkingmustbecountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,
и
and
itissoeveninthe
случае
case
ofphilosophicalthinking;
onehas
здесь
here
tolearnanew,asonelearnedanew
о
about
heredityand"innateness."
As
мало
little
astheactofbirthcomesinto
внимание
consideration
inthewholeprocess
и
and
procedureofheredity,justas
мало
little
is"being-conscious"OPPOSEDtotheinstinctiveinanydecisive
смысле
sense
;
thegreaterpartoftheconsciousthinkingofaphilosopheris
тайно
secretly
influencedbyhisinstincts,
и
and
forcedintodefinitechannels.
И
And
behindalllogicanditsseemingsovereigntyofmovement,therearevaluations,
или
or
tospeakmoreplainly,physiologicaldemands,forthe
поддержания
maintenance
ofadefinitemodeof
жизни
life
Forexample,thatthecertainis
стоит
worth
morethantheuncertain,
что
that
illusionislessvaluable
чем
than
"truth"suchvaluations,in
несмотря
spite
oftheirregulativeimportancefor
Нас
US
,mightnotwithstandingbeonlysuperficialvaluations,specialkindsofniaiserie,
такие
such
asmaybenecessaryforthe
поддержания
maintenance
ofbeingssuchasourselves.
Supposing,ineffect,thatmanisnot
просто
just
the"measureofthings."
4.
Thefalsenessofanopinionisnotforusanyobjectiontoit:
itis
здесь
here
,perhaps,thatournew
язык
language
soundsmoststrangely.
The
вопрос
question
is,howfaran
мнение
opinion
islife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,
возможно
perhaps
species-rearing,andwearefundamentallyinclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions(towhichthesyntheticjudgmentsapriori
принадлежат
belong)
,arethemostindispensableto
нас
us
,thatwithoutarecognitionof
логических
logical
fictions,withoutacomparisonofreality
с
with
thepurelyIMAGINEDworldoftheabsolute
и
and
immutable,withoutaconstantcounterfeitingoftheworldbymeansofnumbers,mancouldnotlive—thattherenunciationoffalseopinionswouldbearenunciationof
жизни
life
,anegationoflife.
TO
Признать
RECOGNISE
UNTRUTHASACONDITIONOF
Жизни
LIFE
;
thatiscertainlytoimpugnthe
традиционные
traditional
ideasofvalueinadangerous
образом
manner
,andaphilosophywhichventuresto
сделать
do
so,hastherebyaloneplaceditselfbeyondgood
и
and
evil.
5.
Thatwhichcausesphilosopherstoberegardedhalf-distrustfully
и
and
half-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeated
открытие
discovery
howinnocenttheyare—how
часто
often
andeasilytheymakemistakes
и
and
losetheirway,inshort,
как
how
childishandchildliketheyare,—butthatthereisnotenoughhonestdealing
с
with
them,whereastheyallraisea
громкий
loud
andvirtuousoutcrywhenthe
проблема
problem
oftruthfulnessisevenhintedatintheremotestmanner.
They
все
all
poseasthoughtheirrealopinionshadbeendiscovered
и
and
attainedthroughtheself-evolvingofa
холодной
cold
,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(in
отличие
contrast
toallsortsofmystics,
которые
who
,fairerandfoolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,in
самом деле
fact
,aprejudicedproposition,idea,
или
or
"suggestion,"whichisgenerallytheirheart'sdesireabstracted
и
and
refined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtout
после
after
theevent.
Theyare
все
all
advocateswhodonotwishtoberegardedassuch,
обычно
generally
astutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,whichtheydub"truths,"—and
Очень
VERY
farfromhavingthe
совести
conscience
whichbravelyadmitsthistoitself,
очень
very
farfromhavingthegoodtasteofthecouragewhichgoesso
далеко
far
astoletthisbeunderstood,
возможно
perhaps
towarnfriendorfoe,
или
or
incheerfulconfidenceandself-ridicule.
ThespectacleoftheTartufferyofoldKant,
одинаково
equally
stiffanddecent,withwhichheenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthat
ведут
lead
(morecorrectlymislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousones
улыбаться
smile
,wewhofindnosmallamusementinspyingoutthesubtletricksofoldmoralists
и
and
ethicalpreachers.
Or,stillmoreso,thehocus-pocusinmathematicalform,bymeansofwhichSpinozahas,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyinmail
и
and
mask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"to
перевести
translate
thetermfairlyandsquarely—inordertherebytostrike
ужас
terror
atonceintothe
сердце
heart
oftheassailantwhoshoulddaretocasta
взгляд
glance
onthatinvinciblemaiden,thatPallasAthene:—howmuchofpersonaltimidity
и
and
vulnerabilitydoesthismasqueradeofasicklyreclusebetray!
6.
Ithasgraduallybecome
ясно
clear
tomewhateverygreat
философия
philosophy
uptillnowhasconsistedof—namely,the
исповедь
confession
ofitsoriginator,andaspeciesofinvoluntary
и
and
unconsciousauto-biography;
andmoreoverthatthemoral(orimmoral)
цель
purpose
ineveryphilosophyhasconstitutedthetruevitalgermoutofwhichtheentire
растение
plant
hasalwaysgrown.
Indeed,to
понять
understand
howtheabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsofaphilosopherhavebeenarrivedat,itis
всегда
always
well(andwise)to
сначала
first
askoneself:
"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Accordingly,Idonot
верю
believe
thatan"impulsetoknowledge"isthefatherofphilosophy;
но
but
thatanotherimpulse,hereas
других
elsewhere
,hasonlymadeuseof
знание
knowledge
(andmistakenknowledge!)
as
в
an
instrument.
Butwhoeverconsidersthefundamentalimpulsesofman
с
with
aviewtodetermininghowfarthey
могут
may
havehereactedasINSPIRINGGENII
Или
(or
asdemonsandcobolds),willfind
что
that
theyhaveallpracticedphilosophyatone
время
time
oranother,andthat
каждый
each
oneofthemwouldhavebeenonlytoogladtolookuponitselfastheultimateendofexistence
и
and
thelegitimateLORDover
все
all
theotherimpulses.
For
каждый
every
impulseisimperious,andas
Такой
SUCH
,attemptstophilosophize.
Tobe
конечно
sure
,inthecaseofscholars,inthe
случае
case
ofreallyscientificmen,it
может
may
beotherwise—"better,"ifyouwill;
там
there
theremayreallybesucha
вещь
thing
asan"impulsetoknowledge,"somekindof
небольшой
small
,independentclock-work,which,when
хорошо
well
woundup,worksawayindustriouslytothatend,WITHOUTtherestofthescholarlyimpulsestakinganymaterialparttherein.
The
фактические
actual
"interests"ofthescholar,
следовательно
therefore
,aregenerallyinquiteanotherdirection—inthefamily,
возможно
perhaps
,orinmoney-making,orinpolitics;
it
находится
is
,infact,almostindifferentatwhatpointof
исследования
research
hislittlemachineisplaced,
и
and
whetherthehopefulyoung
работник
worker
becomesagoodphilologist,amushroomspecialist,
или
or
achemist;
heisnotCHARACTERISEDbybecomingthis
или
or
that.
Inthephilosopher,onthe
напротив
contrary
,thereisabsolutelynothingimpersonal;
и
and
aboveall,hismoralityfurnishesadecided
и
and
decisivetestimonyasto
Кто
WHO
HEIS,—thatistosay,inwhatorderthedeepestimpulsesofhisnaturestandto
друг
each
other.
7.
Howmaliciousphilosophers
могут
can
be!
Iknowof
ничего
nothing
morestingingthanthe
шутка
joke
EpicurustookthelibertyofmakingonPlato
и
and
thePlatonists;
hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Initsoriginal
смысле
sense
,andonthefaceofit,thewordsignifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessories
и
and
lick-spittles;
besidesthis,however,itisasmuchasto
сказать
say
,"TheyareallACTORS,thereis
ничего
nothing
genuineaboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwasapopularnameforanactor).
И
And
thelatterisreallythemalignantreproach
это
that
EpicuruscastuponPlato:
hewasannoyedbythegrandiosemanner,themiseenscenestyleofwhichPlato
и
and
hisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnotamaster!
Он
He
,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,whosatconcealedinhislittlegardenatAthens,
и
and
wrotethreehundredbooks,
возможно
perhaps
outofrageandambitious
зависти
envy
ofPlato,whoknows!
Greecetooka
сто
hundred
yearstofindout
кто
who
thegarden-godEpicurusreallywas.
Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Есть
There
isapointineveryphilosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthephilosopherappearsonthescene;
или
or
,toputitinthewordsofanancientmystery:.
Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
Youdesireto
Жить
LIVE
"accordingtoNature"?
Oh,younobleStoics,what
обман
fraud
ofwords!
ImaginetoyourselvesabeinglikeNature,boundlesslyextravagant,boundlesslyindifferent,withoutpurpose
или
or
consideration,withoutpityor
справедливости
justice
,atoncefruitfulandbarren
и
and
uncertain:
imaginetoyourselves
Безразличие
INDIFFERENCE
asapower—howCOULDyou
жить
live
inaccordancewithsuch
безразличие
indifference
?
Tolive—isnotthat
просто
just
endeavouringtobeotherwise
чем
than
thisNature?
Isnotlivingvaluing,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobedifferent?
И
And
grantedthatyourimperative,"living
соответствии
according
toNature,"meansactuallythesameas"living
соответствии
according
tolife"—howcouldyoudoDIFFERENTLY?
Почему
Why
shouldyoumakea
принцип
principle
outofwhatyouyourselvesare,
и
and
mustbe?
Inreality,however,itis
совсем
quite
otherwisewithyou:
whileyoupretendtoread
с
with
rapturethecanonofyourlawinNature,you
хотите
want
somethingquitethecontrary,youextraordinarystage-players
и
and
self-deluders!
Inyourprideyou
хотите
wish
todictateyourmorals
и
and
idealstoNature,toNatureherself,
и
and
toincorporatethemtherein;
youinsistthatitshallbe
Природа
Nature
"accordingtotheStoa,"
и
and
wouldlikeeverythingtobemadeafteryourownimage,asavast,eternalglorification
и
and
generalismofStoicism!
With
все
all
yourlovefortruth,you
есть
have
forcedyourselvessolong,sopersistently,
и
and
withsuchhypnoticrigidityto
видеть
see
NatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,thatyouare
не
no
longerabletoseeitotherwise—andtocrown
все
all
,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamitehopethat
Потому что
BECAUSE
youareabletotyrannizeoveryourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewill
также
also
allowherselftobetyrannizedover:
isnottheStoica
Частью
PART
ofNature?...
Butthisisanold
и
and
everlastingstory:
whathappenedinoldtimes
со
with
theStoicsstillhappens
сегодня
today
,assoonasevera
философия
philosophy
beginstobelieveinitself.
It
всегда
always
createstheworldinitsownimage;
itcannotdo
иначе
otherwise
;
philosophyisthistyrannical
импульс
impulse
itself,themostspiritualWillto
Власти
Power
,thewillto"creationoftheworld,"thewilltothecausaprima.
10.
Theeagerness
и
and
subtlety,Ishouldevensaycraftiness,
с
with
whichtheproblemof"thereal
и
and
theapparentworld"isdealt
с
with
atpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishesfoodforthought
и
and
attention;
andhewhohears
только
only
a"WilltoTruth"inthe
заднем плане
background
,andnothingelse,cannotcertainly
похвастаться
boast
ofthesharpestears.
In
редких
rare
andisolatedcases,itmay
действительно
really
havehappenedthatsuchaWilltoTruth—acertainextravagant
и
and
adventurouspluck,ametaphysician's
амбиция
ambition
oftheforlornhope—hasparticipatedtherein:
thatwhichintheend
всегда
always
prefersahandfulof"certainty"toawholecartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;
there
могут
may
evenbepuritanicalfanaticsof
совести
conscience
,whoprefertoputtheirlasttrustinasure
ничего
nothing
,ratherthaninanuncertain
то
something
.
ButthatisNihilism,
и
and
thesignofadespairing,mortallywearied
души
soul
,notwithstandingthecourageousbearingsucha
добродетель
virtue
maydisplay.
Itseems,however,tobeotherwise
с
with
strongerandlivelierthinkers
которые
who
arestilleagerfor
жизни
life
.
InthattheysideAGAINSTappearance,
и
and
speaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthecredibilityoftheirownbodies
о
about
aslowasthecredibilityoftheocularevidencethat"theearthstandsstill,"
и
and
thus,apparently,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurestpossessionto
убежать
escape
(forwhatdoesoneatpresentbelieveinmore
твердо
firmly
thaninone'sbody?),—whoknowsiftheyarenot
действительно
really
tryingtowinback
то
something
whichwasformerlyanevensecurerpossession,
то
something
oftheolddomainofthefaithofformertimes,
возможно
perhaps
the"immortalsoul,"perhaps"theoldGod,"inshort,ideasbywhichtheycould
жить
live
better,thatisto
говорят
say
,morevigorouslyandmorejoyously,
чем
than
by"modernideas"?
ThereisDISTRUSTofthesemodernideasinthismodeoflookingatthings,adisbeliefinall
что
that
hasbeenconstructedyesterday
и
and
today;
thereisperhapssomeslightadmixtureofsatiety
и
and
scorn,whichcannolonger
терпеть
endure
theBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthemostvaried
происхождения
origin
,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresentthrowsonthe
рынок
market
;
adisgustofthe
более
more
refinedtasteatthevillage-fairmotleyness
и
and
patchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhomthereis
ничего
nothing
eithernewortrue,
кроме
except
thismotleyness.
Thereinitseemstomethatweshouldagree
с
with
thoseskepticalanti-realistsandknowledge-microscopistsofthepresent
дня
day
;
theirinstinct,whichrepelsthemfromMODERNreality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
нас
us
!
ThemainthingaboutthemisNOT
что
that
theywishtogo"back,"but
что
that
theywishtogetAWAYtherefrom.
A
немного
little
MOREstrength,swing,courage,
и
and
artisticpower,andtheywouldbeOFF—andnotback!
11.
Itseemstomethatthereis
повсюду
everywhere
anattemptatpresentto
отвлечь
divert
attentionfromtheactualinfluencewhichKantexercisedonGermanphilosophy,
и
and
especiallytoignoreprudentlythe
ценность
value
whichhesetuponhimself.
Kantwasfirstand
первую очередь
foremost
proudofhisTableofCategories;
с
with
itinhishandhesaid:
"Thisisthemostdifficult
вещь
thing
thatcouldeverbeundertakenon
имени
behalf
ofmetaphysics."
Letusonlyunderstand
это
this
"couldbe"!
HewasproudofhavingDISCOVEREDanewfacultyinman,thefacultyofsyntheticjudgmentapriori.
Granting
что
that
hedeceivedhimselfinthismatter;
the
развитие
development
andrapidflourishingofGermanphilosophydepended
тем не менее
nevertheless
onhispride,andontheeagerrivalryoftheyounger
поколения
generation
todiscoverifpossiblesomething—atallevents"newfaculties"—of
что
which
tobestillprouder!—Butletusreflectforamoment—itishightimetodoso.
"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kantaskshimself—andwhatis
самом деле
really
hisanswer?
"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—but
к сожалению
unfortunately
notinfivewords,
но
but
socircumstantially,imposingly,and
с
with
suchdisplayofGermanprofundity
и
and
verbalflourishes,thatonealtogetherlosessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemandeinvolvedin
такой
such
ananswer.
Peoplewerebesidethemselveswithdelightoverthisnewfaculty,
и
and
thejubilationreachedits
апогея
climax
whenKantfurtherdiscoveredamoralfacultyinman—forat
что
that
timeGermanswerestillmoral,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."
Thencamethe
медовый месяц
honeymoon
ofGermanphilosophy.
All
в
the
youngtheologiansoftheTubingeninstitutionwent
немедленно
immediately
intothegroves—allseekingfor"faculties."
И
And
whatdidtheynotfind—inthatinnocent,rich,
и
and
stillyouthfulperiodoftheGermanspirit,towhichRomanticism,themalicious
фея
fairy
,pipedandsang,whenonecouldnotyet
отличить
distinguish
between"finding"and"inventing"!
Aboveallafacultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristened
его
it
,intellectualintuition,andtherebygratifiedthemostearnestlongingsofthe
естественно
naturally
pious-inclinedGermans.
Onecandonogreaterwrongtothewholeofthisexuberant
и
and
eccentricmovement(whichwas
самом деле
really
youthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoary
и
and
senileconceptions),thantotakeit
всерьез
seriously
,oreventreatit
с
with
moralindignation.
Enough,however—the
мир
world
grewolder,andthe
мечта
dream
vanished.
Atimecame
когда
when
peoplerubbedtheirforeheads,
и
and
theystillrubthemtoday.
Люди
People
hadbeendreaming,andfirst
и
and
foremost—oldKant.
"Bymeansofameans(faculty)"—hehadsaid,
или
or
atleastmeantto
сказать
say
.
But,isthat—ananswer?
An
объяснение
explanation
?
Orisitnotrathermerelyarepetitionofthequestion?
Как
How
doesopiuminducesleep?
"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"
именно
namely
thevirtusdormitiva,repliesthe
доктор
doctor
inMoliere,.
Butsuchreplies
принадлежат
belong
totherealmofcomedy,
и
and
itishightimeto
заменить
replace
theKantianquestion,"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaPRIORIpossible?"
byanotherquestion,"Whyis
вера
belief
insuchjudgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishigh
время
time
thatweshouldunderstand
что
that
suchjudgmentsmustbebelievedtobetrue,forthe
ради
sake
ofthepreservationofcreatureslikeourselves;
thoughthey
все еще
still
mightnaturallybefalsejudgments!
Или
Or
,moreplainlyspoken,and
грубо
roughly
andreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriorishouldnot"bepossible"atall;
wehave
не
no
righttothem;
inourmouthstheyarenothingbutfalsejudgments.
Только
Only
,ofcourse,thebeliefintheirtruthisnecessary,asplausible
вера
belief
andocularevidencebelongingtotheperspectiveviewof
жизнь
life
.
Andfinally,tocalltomindtheenormousinfluencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
надеюсь
hope
youunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughoutthe
всю
whole
ofEurope,thereis
нет
no
doubtthatacertainVIRTUSDORMITIVAhadashareinit;
thankstoGermanphilosophy,itwasadelighttothenobleidlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
и
and
thepoliticalobscurantistsof
все
all
nations,tofindan
противоядие
antidote
tothestilloverwhelmingsensualismwhichoverflowedfromthelast
века
century
intothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...