PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthisawoman—whatthen?
Istherenotgroundforsuspectingthat
все
allphilosophers,insofarastheyhavebeendogmatists,havefailedtoпонять
understandwomen—thattheterribleseriousnessи
andclumsyimportunitywithwhichtheyhaveusuallypaidtheiraddressestoTruth,havebeenunskilledи
andunseemlymethodsforwinningawoman?Certainlyshehasneverallowedherselftobewon;
и
andatpresenteverykindofdogmastandsс
withsadanddiscouragedmien—IF,indeed,itstandsatall!For
есть
therearescofferswhomaintainthatithasfallen,thatвсе
alldogmaliesontheground—nayболее
more,thatitisatitslastgasp.Но
Buttospeakseriously,therearegoodgroundsforhopingthatвсе
alldogmatizinginphilosophy,whateversolemn,whateverconclusiveи
anddecidedairsithasassumed,может
mayhavebeenonlyanoblepuerilismи
andtyronism;andprobablythe
время
timeisathandwhenitбудет
willbeonceandagainunderstoodWHAThasactuallysufficedforthebasisofsuchimposingи
andabsolutephilosophicaledificesasthedogmatistshavehithertoreared:возможно
perhapssomepopularsuperstitionofimmemorialtime(suchasthesoul-superstition,which,intheformofsubject-и
andego-superstition,hasnotyetceaseddoingmischief):возможно
perhapssomeplayuponwords,adeceptiononthepartofgrammar,или
oranaudaciousgeneralizationofочень
veryrestricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.Thephilosophyofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,was
только
onlyapromiseforthousandsofyearsafterwards,aswasastrologyinдо сих пор
stillearliertimes,intheserviceofwhichвероятно
probablymorelabour,gold,acuteness,и
andpatiencehavebeenspentчем
thanonanyactualsciencehitherto:weowetoit,
и
andtoits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsiaи
andEgypt,thegrandstyleofarchitecture.Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesuponthe
сердце
heartofhumanitywitheverlastingclaims,все
allgreatthingshavefirsttowanderabouttheземле
earthasenormousandawe-inspiringcaricatures:dogmaticphilosophyhasbeenacaricatureofthiskind—forinstance,theVedantadoctrineinAsia,
и
andPlatonisminEurope.Letusnotbeungratefultoit,althoughitmustcertainlybeconfessed
что
thattheworst,themosttiresome,и
andthemostdangerousoferrorshithertohasbeenadogmatisterror—namely,Plato'sinventionofPureSpiritи
andtheGoodinItself.Но
Butnowwhenithasbeensurmounted,когда
whenEurope,ridofthisnightmare,может
canagaindrawbreathfreelyи
andatleastenjoyahealthier—sleep,мы
we,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsofallthestrengthwhichthestruggleagainstthiserrorhasfostered.Itamountedtotheveryinversionof
истины
truth,andthedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—thefundamentalcondition—ofжизни
life,tospeakofSpiritи
andtheGoodasPlatospokeofних
them;indeedonemightask,asaphysician:
"Howdidsuchamaladyattackthatfinestproductofantiquity,Plato?
HadthewickedSocrates
действительно
reallycorruptedhim?WasSocratesafterall
в
acorrupterofyouths,anddeservedhishemlock?"Но
ButthestruggleagainstPlato,or—tospeakplainer,и
andforthe"people"—thestruggleпротив
againsttheecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsofChristianity(FORCHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFORTHE"PEOPLE"),producedinEuropeamagnificenttensionofsoul,suchashadnotexistedanywherepreviously;с
withsuchatenselystrainedbowonecanтеперь
nowaimatthefurthestgoals.Asamatteroffact,theEuropeanfeels
это
thistensionasastateofdistress,и
andtwiceattemptshavebeenmadeingrandstyletounbendthebow:oncebymeansofJesuitism,
и
andthesecondtimebymeansofdemocraticenlightenment—which,с
withtheaidoflibertyofthepressи
andnewspaper-reading,might,infact,bringitaboutчто
thatthespiritwouldnotsoeasilyfinditselfin"distress"!(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—allcreditto
них
them!buttheyagainmadethingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
Но
Butwe,whoareneitherJesuits,nordemocrats,norдаже
evensufficientlyGermans,weGOODEUROPEANS,и
andfree,VERYfreespirits—wehaveitвсе еще
still,allthedistressofspiritи
andallthetensionofitsbow!И
Andperhapsalsothearrow,theduty,и
and,whoknows?THEGOALTOAIMAT....
CHAPTERI.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
TheWilltoTruth,whichistotemptustomanyahazardousenterprise,thefamousTruthfulnessofwhich
все
allphilosophershavehithertospokenс
withrespect,whatquestionshasэта
thisWilltoTruthnotlaidперед
beforeus!Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itis
уже
alreadyalongstory;yetitseemsasifitwerehardlycommenced.
Isitanywonderifweatlastgrowdistrustful,losepatience,
и
andturnimpatientlyaway?That
этот
thisSphinxteachesusatlasttoaskquestionsourselves?Кто
WHOisitreallythatputsquestionstoushere?WHAT
самом деле
reallyisthis"WilltoTruth"inнас
us?Infactwemadea
долго
longhaltatthequestionastotheoriginofthisWill—untilatlastwecametoanabsolutestandstillперед
beforeayetmorefundamentalquestion.Weinquired
о
abouttheVALUEofthisWill.Granted
что
thatwewantthetruth:Почему
WHYNOTRATHERuntruth?Anduncertainty?
Даже
Evenignorance?Theproblemofthevalueof
истины
truthpresenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwewhopresentedourselvesперед
beforetheproblem?WhichofusistheOedipus
здесь
here?WhichtheSphinx?
Itwouldseemtobearendezvousofquestions
и
andnotesofinterrogation.Andcoulditbebelieved
что
thatitatlastseemstousasiftheпроблема
problemhadneverbeenpropoundedраньше
before,asifwewerethefirsttodiscernit,getasightofit,и
andRISKRAISINGit?For
есть
thereisriskinraisingего
it,perhapsthereisnogreaterrisk.2.
"HOWCOULDanythingoriginateoutofitsopposite?
Forexample,truthoutoferror?
или
ortheWilltoTruthoutofthewilltodeception?или
orthegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?или
orthepuresun-brightvisionofthewisemanoutofcovetousness?Такой
Suchgenesisisimpossible;whoeverdreamsofitisafool,nay,worsethanafool;
thingsofthehighestvaluemust
иметь
haveadifferentorigin,anoriginofTHEIRown—inthistransitory,seductive,illusory,paltryмире
world,inthisturmoilofdelusionи
andcupidity,theycannothavetheirsource.Но
ButratherinthelapofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealedGod,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THEREmustbetheirsource,и
andnowhereelse!"—Thismodeofreasoningdisclosesthetypicalprejudicebywhichmetaphysiciansofalltimescanberecognized,этот
thismodeofvaluationisatthebackofalltheirlogicalprocedure;throughthis"belief"oftheirs,theyexertthemselvesfortheir"knowledge,"for
то
somethingthatisintheendsolemnlychristened"theTruth."ThefundamentalbeliefofmetaphysiciansisTHEBELIEFINANTITHESESOFVALUES.
Itneveroccurred
даже
eventothewariestofthemtodoubtздесь
hereontheverythreshold(wheredoubt,however,wasmostnecessary);thoughtheyhadmadeasolemnvow,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."
Foritmaybedoubted,firstly,whetherantithesesexistatall;
и
andsecondly,whetherthepopularvaluationsи
andantithesesofvalueuponчто
whichmetaphysicianshavesettheirseal,arenotperhapsmerelysuperficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,besidesbeingprobablymadefromsomecorner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,toborrowanexpressioncurrentamongpainters.Inspiteofallthevaluewhichmaybelongtothetrue,thepositive,
и
andtheunselfish,itmightbeвозможно
possiblethatahigherandболее
morefundamentalvalueforlifegenerallyshouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,toselfishness,и
andcupidity.Itmightevenbe
возможно
possiblethatWHATconstitutesthevalueofthosegoodи
andrespectedthings,consistspreciselyintheirbeinginsidiouslyrelated,knotted,и
andcrochetedtotheseevilи
andapparentlyopposedthings—perhapseveninbeingessentiallyidenticalс
withthem.Perhaps!
Butwhowishestoconcernhimselfwithsuchdangerous"Perhapses"!
For
которые
thatinvestigationonemustawaittheadventofaneworderofphilosophers,suchaswillиметь
haveothertastesandinclinations,thereverseofтех
thosehithertoprevalent—philosophersofthedangerous"Perhaps"ineverysenseoftheterm.И
Andtospeakinallseriousness,Iвижу
seesuchnewphilosophersbeginningtoappear.3.
Havingkeptasharpeyeonphilosophers,
и
andhavingreadbetweentheirlinesдолго
longenough,Inowsaytomyselfthatthegreaterчасть
partofconsciousthinkingmustbecountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,и
anditissoevenintheслучае
caseofphilosophicalthinking;onehas
здесь
heretolearnanew,asonelearnedanewо
aboutheredityand"innateness."As
мало
littleastheactofbirthcomesintoconsiderationinthewholeprocessи
andprocedureofheredity,justasмало
littleis"being-conscious"OPPOSEDtotheinstinctiveinanydecisivesense;thegreater
часть
partoftheconsciousthinkingofaphilosopherissecretlyinfluencedbyhisinstincts,и
andforcedintodefinitechannels.И
Andbehindalllogicanditsseemingsovereigntyofmovement,therearevaluations,или
ortospeakmoreplainly,physiologicaldemands,forthemaintenanceofadefinitemodeofжизни
lifeForexample,thatthecertainisworthmoreчем
thantheuncertain,thatillusionislessvaluableчем
than"truth"suchvaluations,inspiteoftheirregulativeimportanceforНас
US,mightnotwithstandingbeonlysuperficialvaluations,specialkindsofniaiserie,такие
suchasmaybenecessaryforthemaintenanceofbeingsтакие
suchasourselves.Supposing,ineffect,thatmanisnot
просто
justthe"measureofthings."4.
Thefalsenessofanopinionisnotforusanyobjectiontoit:
itis
здесь
here,perhaps,thatournewlanguagesoundsmoststrangely.The
вопрос
questionis,howfaranopinionislife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,возможно
perhapsspecies-rearing,andwearefundamentallyinclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions(towhichthesyntheticjudgmentsaprioribelong),arethemostindispensabletoнас
us,thatwithoutarecognitionoflogicalfictions,withoutacomparisonofrealityс
withthepurelyIMAGINEDworldoftheabsoluteи
andimmutable,withoutaconstantcounterfeitingoftheworldbymeansofnumbers,mancouldnotlive—thattherenunciationoffalseopinionswouldbearenunciationofжизни
life,anegationoflife.TORECOGNISEUNTRUTHASACONDITIONOF
Жизни
LIFE;thatiscertainlytoimpugnthetraditionalideasofvalueinadangerousmanner,
и
andaphilosophywhichventurestoсделать
doso,hastherebyaloneplaceditselfbeyondgoodи
andevil.5.
Thatwhichcausesphilosopherstoberegardedhalf-distrustfully
и
andhalf-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeateddiscoveryкак
howinnocenttheyare—howoftenи
andeasilytheymakemistakesи
andlosetheirway,inshort,как
howchildishandchildliketheyare,—butthatthereisnotenoughhonestdealingс
withthem,whereastheyallraisealoudи
andvirtuousoutcrywhentheпроблема
problemoftruthfulnessisevenhintedatintheremotestmanner.They
все
allposeasthoughtheirrealopinionshadbeendiscoveredи
andattainedthroughtheself-evolvingofaхолодной
cold,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(incontrasttoвсе
allsortsofmystics,who,fairerи
andfoolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,inсамом деле
fact,aprejudicedproposition,idea,или
or"suggestion,"whichisgenerallytheirheart'sdesireabstractedи
andrefined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtoutпосле
aftertheevent.Theyare
все
alladvocateswhodonotwishtoberegardedassuch,generallyastutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,whichtheydub"truths,"—andОчень
VERYfarfromhavingtheconsciencewhichbravelyadmitsэто
thistoitself,veryfarfromhavingthegoodtasteofthecouragewhichgoessoдалеко
farastoletthisbeunderstood,возможно
perhapstowarnfriendorfoe,или
orincheerfulconfidenceandself-ridicule.ThespectacleoftheTartufferyofoldKant,equallystiff
и
anddecent,withwhichheenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthatlead(morecorrectlymislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousonessmile,wewhofindне
nosmallamusementinspyingoutthesubtletricksofoldmoralistsи
andethicalpreachers.Or,stillmoreso,thehocus-pocusinmathematicalform,bymeansofwhichSpinozahas,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyinmail
и
andmask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"totranslatethetermfairlyи
andsquarely—inordertherebytostriketerroratonceintotheсердце
heartoftheassailantwhoshoulddaretocastaglanceonthatinvinciblemaiden,thatPallasAthene:—howmuchofpersonaltimidityи
andvulnerabilitydoesthismasqueradeofasicklyreclusebetray!6.
Ithasgraduallybecome
ясно
cleartomewhateverygreatphilosophyuptillnowhasconsistedof—namely,theconfessionofitsoriginator,и
andaspeciesofinvoluntaryи
andunconsciousauto-biography;andmoreoverthatthemoral(orimmoral)purposein
все
everyphilosophyhasconstitutedthetruevitalgermoutofwhichtheentireplanthasвсегда
alwaysgrown.Indeed,tounderstand
как
howtheabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsofaphilosopherhavebeenarrivedat,itisвсегда
alwayswell(andwise)toсначала
firstaskoneself:"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Accordingly,Idonot
верю
believethatan"impulsetoknowledge"isthefatherofphilosophy;но
butthatanotherimpulse,hereaselsewhere,hasтолько
onlymadeuseofknowledgeИ
(andmistakenknowledge!)asaninstrument.
Но
Butwhoeverconsidersthefundamentalimpulsesofmanс
withaviewtodetermininghowfartheyмогут
mayhavehereactedasINSPIRINGGENIIИли
(orasdemonsandcobolds),willfindчто
thattheyhaveallpracticedphilosophyatoneвремя
timeoranother,andthatкаждый
eachoneofthemwouldhavebeenonlytoogladtolookuponitselfastheultimateendofexistenceи
andthelegitimateLORDoverвсе
alltheotherimpulses.For
каждый
everyimpulseisimperious,andasТакой
SUCH,attemptstophilosophize.Tobe
конечно
sure,inthecaseofscholars,intheслучае
caseofreallyscientificmen,itможет
maybeotherwise—"better,"ifyouwill;там
theretheremayreallybesuchaвещь
thingasan"impulsetoknowledge,"somekindofнебольшой
small,independentclock-work,which,whenхорошо
wellwoundup,worksawayindustriouslytothatend,WITHOUTtherestofthescholarlyimpulsestakinganymaterialparttherein.Theactual"interests"ofthescholar,therefore,aregenerallyin
совсем
quiteanotherdirection—inthefamily,возможно
perhaps,orinmoney-making,orinpolitics;it
находится
is,infact,almostindifferentatwhatpointofresearchhislittlemachineisplaced,и
andwhetherthehopefulyoungworkerbecomesagoodphilologist,amushroomspecialist,или
orachemist;heisnotCHARACTERISEDbybecomingthis
или
orthat.Inthephilosopher,onthecontrary,thereisabsolutely
ничего
nothingimpersonal;andaboveall,hismoralityfurnishesadecided
и
anddecisivetestimonyastoКто
WHOHEIS,—thatistosay,inwhatorderthedeepestimpulsesofhisnaturestandtoдруг
eachother.7.
Howmaliciousphilosophers
могут
canbe!Iknowof
ничего
nothingmorestingingthanthejokeEpicurustookthelibertyofmakingonPlatoи
andthePlatonists;hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Initsoriginalsense,
и
andonthefaceofit,thewordsignifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessoriesи
andlick-spittles;besidesthis,however,itisasmuchasto
сказать
say,"TheyareallACTORS,thereisничего
nothinggenuineaboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwasapopularnameforanactor).И
Andthelatterisreallythemalignantreproachэто
thatEpicuruscastuponPlato:hewasannoyedbythegrandiosemanner,themiseenscenestyleofwhichPlato
и
andhisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnotamaster!Он
He,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,whosatconcealedinhislittlegardenatAthens,и
andwrotethreehundredbooks,возможно
perhapsoutofrageandambitiousenvyofPlato,whoknows!Greecetookahundredyearstofindout
кто
whothegarden-godEpicurusreallywas.Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Есть
Thereisapointineveryphilosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthephilosopherappearsonthescene;или
or,toputitinthewordsofanancientmystery:.Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
Youdesireto
Жить
LIVE"accordingtoNature"?Oh,younobleStoics,whatfraudofwords!
ImaginetoyourselvesabeinglikeNature,boundlesslyextravagant,boundlesslyindifferent,withoutpurpose
или
orconsideration,withoutpityorjustice,atoncefruitfulи
andbarrenanduncertain:imaginetoyourselvesINDIFFERENCEasapower—howCOULDyou
жить
liveinaccordancewithsuchindifference?Tolive—isnotthat
просто
justendeavouringtobeotherwiseчем
thanthisNature?Isnotlivingvaluing,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobedifferent?
И
Andgrantedthatyourimperative,"livingaccordingtoNature,"meansactuallythesameas"livingaccordingtolife"—howcouldyoudoDIFFERENTLY?Почему
Whyshouldyoumakeaprincipleoutofwhatyouyourselvesare,и
andmustbe?Inreality,however,itis
совсем
quiteotherwisewithyou:whileyoupretendtoread
с
withrapturethecanonofyourlawinNature,youхотите
wantsomethingquitethecontrary,youextraordinarystage-playersи
andself-deluders!Inyourprideyou
хотите
wishtodictateyourmoralsи
andidealstoNature,toNatureherself,и
andtoincorporatethemtherein;youinsistthatitshallbeNature"accordingtotheStoa,"
и
andwouldlikeeverythingtobemadeafteryourownimage,asavast,eternalglorificationи
andgeneralismofStoicism!With
все
allyourlovefortruth,youесть
haveforcedyourselvessolong,sopersistently,и
andwithsuchhypnoticrigiditytoвидеть
seeNatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,thatyouareне
nolongerabletoseeitotherwise—andtocrownвсе
all,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamitehopethatПотому что
BECAUSEyouareabletotyrannizeoveryourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewillтакже
alsoallowherselftobetyrannizedover:isnottheStoica
Частью
PARTofNature?...Butthisisanold
и
andeverlastingstory:whathappenedinoldtimes
со
withtheStoicsstillhappensсегодня
today,assoonaseveraphilosophybeginstobelieveinitself.It
всегда
alwayscreatestheworldinitsownimage;itcannotdootherwise;
philosophyisthistyrannicalimpulseitself,themostspiritualWillto
Власти
Power,thewillto"creationoftheworld,"thewilltothecausaprima.10.
Theeagerness
и
andsubtlety,Ishouldevensaycraftiness,с
withwhichtheproblemof"therealи
andtheapparentworld"isdealtс
withatpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishesfoodforthoughtи
andattention;andhewhohears
только
onlya"WilltoTruth"inthebackground,и
andnothingelse,cannotcertainlyboastofthesharpestears.Inrare
и
andisolatedcases,itmayдействительно
reallyhavehappenedthatsuchaWilltoTruth—acertainextravagantи
andadventurouspluck,ametaphysician'sambitionoftheforlornhope—hasparticipatedtherein:thatwhichintheend
всегда
alwaysprefersahandfulof"certainty"toawholecartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;there
могут
mayevenbepuritanicalfanaticsofconscience,которые
whoprefertoputtheirlasttrustinasureничего
nothing,ratherthaninanuncertainто
something.ButthatisNihilism,
и
andthesignofadespairing,mortallyweariedsoul,notwithstandingthecourageousbearingsuchavirtueможет
maydisplay.Itseems,however,tobeotherwise
с
withstrongerandlivelierthinkersкоторые
whoarestilleagerforжизни
life.InthattheysideAGAINSTappearance,
и
andspeaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthecredibilityoftheirownbodiesо
aboutaslowasthecredibilityoftheocularevidencethat"theearthstandsstill,"и
andthus,apparently,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurestpossessiontoescape(forwhatdoesoneatpresentbelieveinmorefirmlyчем
thaninone'sbody?),—whoknowsiftheyarenotдействительно
reallytryingtowinbackто
somethingwhichwasformerlyanevensecurerpossession,то
somethingoftheolddomainofthefaithofformertimes,возможно
perhapsthe"immortalsoul,"perhaps"theoldGod,"inshort,ideasbywhichtheycouldжить
livebetter,thatistoговорят
say,morevigorouslyandmorejoyously,чем
thanby"modernideas"?ThereisDISTRUSTofthesemodernideasinthismodeoflookingatthings,adisbeliefinall
что
thathasbeenconstructedyesterdayи
andtoday;thereisperhapssomeslightadmixtureofsatiety
и
andscorn,whichcannolongerenduretheBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthemostvariedorigin,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresentthrowsonthemarket;adisgustofthe
более
morerefinedtasteatthevillage-fairmotleynessи
andpatchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhomthereisничего
nothingeithernewortrue,exceptthismotleyness.Thereinitseemstomethatweshouldagree
с
withthoseskepticalanti-realistsandknowledge-microscopistsofthepresentдня
day;theirinstinct,whichrepelsthemfromMODERNreality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
нас
us!ThemainthingaboutthemisNOT
что
thattheywishtogo"back,"butчто
thattheywishtogetAWAYtherefrom.A
немного
littleMOREstrength,swing,courage,и
andartisticpower,andtheywouldbeOFF—andnotback!11.
ItseemstomethatthereiseverywhereanattemptatpresenttodivertattentionfromtheactualinfluencewhichKantexercisedonGermanphilosophy,
и
andespeciallytoignoreprudentlythevaluewhichhesetuponhimself.KantwasfirstandforemostproudofhisTableofCategories;
с
withitinhishandhesaid:"Thisisthemostdifficult
вещь
thingthatcouldeverbeundertakenonbehalfofmetaphysics."Letusonlyunderstand
это
this"couldbe"!HewasproudofhavingDISCOVEREDanewfacultyinman,thefacultyofsyntheticjudgmentapriori.
Granting
что
thathedeceivedhimselfinthismatter;thedevelopment
и
andrapidflourishingofGermanphilosophydependedneverthelessonhispride,и
andontheeagerrivalryoftheyoungergenerationtodiscoverесли
ifpossiblesomething—atallevents"newfaculties"—ofчто
whichtobestillprouder!—Butletusreflectforamoment—itishightimetodoso."HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kantaskshimself—andwhatis
самом деле
reallyhisanswer?"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—butunfortunatelynotinfivewords,
но
butsocircumstantially,imposingly,andс
withsuchdisplayofGermanprofundityи
andverbalflourishes,thatonealtogetherlosessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemandeinvolvedinтакой
suchananswer.Peoplewerebesidethemselveswithdelightoverthisnewfaculty,
и
andthejubilationreacheditsclimaxкогда
whenKantfurtherdiscoveredamoralfacultyinman—foratчто
thattimeGermanswerestillmoral,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."ThencamethehoneymoonofGermanphilosophy.
Все
Alltheyoungtheologiansofв
theTubingeninstitutionwentimmediatelyintoв
thegroves—allseekingfor"faculties."И
Andwhatdidtheynotfind—inthatinnocent,rich,и
andstillyouthfulperiodoftheGermanspirit,towhichRomanticism,themaliciousfairy,pipedи
andsang,whenonecouldnotyetdistinguishмежду
between"finding"and"inventing"!Aboveallafacultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristened
его
it,intellectualintuition,andtherebygratifiedthemostearnestlongingsofthenaturallypious-inclinedGermans.Onecandonogreaterwrongtothewholeofthisexuberant
и
andeccentricmovement(whichwasсамом деле
reallyyouthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoaryи
andsenileconceptions),thantotakeitseriously,или
oreventreatitwithmoralindignation.Достаточно
Enough,however—theworldgrewolder,и
andthedreamvanished.A
время
timecamewhenpeoplerubbedtheirforeheads,и
andtheystillrubthemtoday.Люди
Peoplehadbeendreaming,andfirstи
andforemost—oldKant."Bymeansofameans(faculty)"—hehadsaid,
или
oratleastmeanttoсказать
say.But,isthat—ananswer?
Anexplanation?
Или
Orisitnotrathermerelyarepetitionofthequestion?Как
Howdoesopiuminducesleep?"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"namelythevirtusdormitiva,repliesthe
доктор
doctorinMoliere,.Butsuchrepliesbelongtotherealmofcomedy,
и
anditishightimetoreplacetheKantianвопрос
question,"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaPRIORIpossible?"byanotherquestion,"Whyisbeliefin
такие
suchjudgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishighвремя
timethatweshouldunderstandчто
thatsuchjudgmentsmustbebelievedtobetrue,forthesakeofthepreservationofcreatureslikeourselves;thoughthey
все еще
stillmightnaturallybefalsejudgments!Или
Or,moreplainlyspoken,androughlyи
andreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriorishouldnot"bepossible"atall;wehave
не
norighttothem;inourmouthstheyarenothingbutfalsejudgments.
Только
Only,ofcourse,thebeliefintheirtruthisnecessary,asplausiblebeliefи
andocularevidencebelongingtotheperspectiveviewofжизнь
life.Andfinally,tocalltomindtheenormousinfluencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
надеюсь
hopeyouunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughouttheвсю
wholeofEurope,thereisнет
nodoubtthatacertainVIRTUSDORMITIVAhadashareinit;thankstoGermanphilosophy,itwasadelighttothenobleidlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
и
andthepoliticalobscurantistsofвсе
allnations,tofindanantidotetotheвсе еще
stilloverwhelmingsensualismwhichoverflowedfromthelastcenturyintothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...