Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Indonesian A1-B2 Students

Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Indonesian A1-B2 Students

Experience the benefits of this forward-thinking translation strategy that tailors language learning to your specific needs. You have control over the difficulty, which ensures that the content is neither too easy nor overly challenging. This method enhances your ability to understand new words through context, reducing reliance on direct translations. While the translations are subtly obscured to foster learning, you can still look up unclear terms. This balanced approach makes language acquisition smoother and more enjoyable. Delve into these translated literary works and discover the satisfaction of mastering a language through reading.

PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthis
seorang
a
woman—whatthen?
Istherenot
dasar
ground
forsuspectingthatallphilosophers,inso
sejauh
far
astheyhavebeendogmatists,
telah
have
failedtounderstandwomen—thatthe
mengerikan
terrible
seriousnessandclumsyimportunity
dengan
with
whichtheyhaveusually
membayar
paid
theiraddressestoTruth,
telah
have
beenunskilledandunseemlymethodsfor
memenangkan
winning
awoman?
Certainlyshehas
pernah
never
allowedherselftobewon;
dan
and
atpresenteverykindofdogmastands
dengan
with
sadanddiscouragedmien—IF,
memang
indeed
,itstandsatall!
For
ada
there
arescofferswhomaintainthatithas
jatuh
fallen
,thatalldogmaliesontheground—nay
lebih
more
,thatitisatitslastgasp.
Tapi
But
tospeakseriously,thereare
baik
good
groundsforhopingthat
semua
all
dogmatizinginphilosophy,whateversolemn,
apa pun
whatever
conclusiveanddecidedairsithasassumed,
mungkin
may
havebeenonlya
mulia
noble
puerilismandtyronism;
and
mungkin
probably
thetimeisathand
ketika
when
itwillbeonce
dan
and
againunderstoodWHAThas
sebenarnya
actually
sufficedforthebasisofsuchimposing
dan
and
absolutephilosophicaledificesas
yang
the
dogmatistshavehithertoreared:
mungkin
perhaps
somepopularsuperstitionofimmemorial
waktu
time
(suchasthesoul-superstition,which,inthe
bentuk
form
ofsubject-
andego-superstition,hasnot
belum
yet
ceaseddoingmischief):
perhaps
beberapa
some
playuponwords,a
penipuan
deception
onthepartof
tata bahasa
grammar
,oranaudaciousgeneralizationof
sangat
very
restricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.
The
filsafat
philosophy
ofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,was
hanya
only
apromiseforthousandsofyears
kemudian
afterwards
,aswasastrologyinstill
sebelumnya
earlier
times,intheserviceofwhich
mungkin
probably
morelabour,gold,acuteness,
dan
and
patiencehavebeenspentthanonanyactual
ilmu
science
hitherto:
weowetoit,
dan
and
toits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsia
dan
and
Egypt,thegrandstyleof
arsitektur
architecture
.
Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesuponthe
hati
heart
ofhumanitywitheverlastingclaims,
semua
all
greatthingshavefirstto
mengembara
wander
abouttheearthasenormous
dan
and
awe-inspiringcaricatures:
dogmaticphilosophyhasbeenacaricatureof
ini
this
kind—forinstance,theVedanta
doktrin
doctrine
inAsia,andPlatonisminEurope.
Mari
Let
usnotbeungratefultoit,
meskipun
although
itmustcertainlybeconfessedthatthe
terburuk
worst
,themosttiresome,andthe
paling
most
dangerousoferrorshithertohasbeenadogmatisterror—namely,Plato's
penemuan
invention
ofPureSpiritandthe
Baik
Good
inItself.
Butnow
ketika
when
ithasbeensurmounted,
ketika
when
Europe,ridofthis
mimpi buruk
nightmare
,canagaindrawbreath
bebas
freely
andatleastenjoyahealthier—sleep,
kita
we
,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsof
semua
all
thestrengthwhichthe
perjuangan
struggle
againstthiserrorhasfostered.
Itamountedtotheveryinversionoftruth,andthedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—thefundamentalcondition—oflife,tospeakofSpiritandtheGoodasPlatospokeofthem;
memang
indeed
onemightask,as
seorang
a
physician:
"Howdidsuchamalady
menyerang
attack
thatfinestproductofantiquity,Plato?
Had
yang
the
wickedSocratesreallycorruptedhim?
WasSocrates
setelah
after
allacorrupterofyouths,
dan
and
deservedhishemlock?"
But
yang
the
struggleagainstPlato,or—to
berbicara
speak
plainer,andforthe"people"—the
perjuangan
struggle
againsttheecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsofChristianity
Untuk
(FOR
CHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFOR
Yang
THE
"PEOPLE"),producedinEuropeamagnificent
ketegangan
tension
ofsoul,suchashadnot
ada
existed
anywherepreviously;
withsuchatenselystrained
busur
bow
onecannowaimatthefurthestgoals.
Asamatteroffact,the
Eropa
European
feelsthistensionasa
keadaan
state
ofdistress,andtwiceattempts
telah
have
beenmadeingrand
gaya
style
tounbendthebow:
oncebymeansofJesuitism,
dan
and
thesecondtimebymeansof
demokratis
democratic
enlightenment—which,withtheaidof
kebebasan
liberty
ofthepressandnewspaper-reading,might,infact,
membawa
bring
itaboutthatthe
roh
spirit
wouldnotsoeasily
menemukan
find
itselfin"distress"!
(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—all
kredit
credit
tothem!
buttheyagain
membuat
made
thingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
Tapi
But
we,whoareneitherJesuits,
atau
nor
democrats,norevensufficientlyGermans,we
Baik
GOOD
EUROPEANS,andfree,VERY
bebas
free
spirits—wehaveitstill,
semua
all
thedistressofspirit
dan
and
allthetensionofitsbow!
Dan
And
perhapsalsothearrow,the
tugas
duty
,and,whoknows?
THEGOALTOAIMAT....
Bab
CHAPTER
I.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
The
Akan
Will
toTruth,whichisto
menggoda
tempt
ustomanya
berbahaya
hazardous
enterprise,thefamousTruthfulnessofwhich
semua
all
philosophershavehithertospoken
dengan
with
respect,whatquestionshas
ini
this
WilltoTruthnotlaidbefore
kita
us
!
Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itis
sudah
already
alongstory;
yetitseemsasifitwerehardlycommenced.
Isitany
mengherankan
wonder
ifweatlastgrowdistrustful,
kehilangan
lose
patience,andturnimpatientlyaway?
Bahwa
That
thisSphinxteachesusatlastto
bertanya
ask
questionsourselves?
WHOisit
sebenarnya
really
thatputsquestionstous
sini
here
?
WHATreallyisthis"WilltoTruth"in
kita
us
?
Infactwemadea
lama
long
haltatthequestionasto
yang
the
originofthisWill—untilatlastwe
datang
came
toanabsolutestandstillbeforeayet
lebih
more
fundamentalquestion.
Weinquired
tentang
about
theVALUEofthisWill.
Granted
bahwa
that
wewantthetruth:
Mengapa
WHY
NOTRATHERuntruth?
And
ketidakpastian
uncertainty
?
Evenignorance?
Theproblemofthe
nilai
value
oftruthpresenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwewhopresentedourselvesbeforethe
masalah
problem
?
WhichofusistheOedipus
sini
here
?
WhichtheSphinx?
Itwouldseemtobearendezvousofquestions
dan
and
notesofinterrogation.
Andcoulditbebelievedthatitatlastseemstousasifthe
masalah
problem
hadneverbeenpropounded
sebelumnya
before
,asifwewerethe
pertama
first
todiscernit,geta
pandangan
sight
ofit,andRISKRAISINGit?
For
ada
there
isriskinraisingit,
mungkin
perhaps
thereisnogreater
risiko
risk
.
2.
"HOWCOULDanythingoriginateoutofitsopposite?
Forexample,
kebenaran
truth
outoferror?
ortheWillto
Kebenaran
Truth
outofthewillto
penipuan
deception
?
orthegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?
atau
or
thepuresun-brightvisionof
yang
the
wisemanoutofcovetousness?
Seperti
Such
genesisisimpossible;
whoeverdreamsofitisafool,nay,
buruk
worse
thanafool;
thingsof
yang
the
highestvaluemusthavea
berbeda
different
origin,anoriginofTHEIRown—in
ini
this
transitory,seductive,illusory,paltry
dunia
world
,inthisturmoilofdelusion
dan
and
cupidity,theycannothavetheir
sumber
source
.
Butratherinthe
pangkuan
lap
ofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealed
Allah
God
,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THEREmustbetheir
sumber
source
,andnowhereelse!"—Thismodeof
penalaran
reasoning
disclosesthetypicalprejudiceby
mana
which
metaphysiciansofalltimes
dapat
can
berecognized,thismodeofvaluationisatthe
belakang
back
ofalltheirlogical
prosedur
procedure
;
throughthis"belief"oftheirs,they
mengerahkan
exert
themselvesfortheir"knowledge,"for
sesuatu
something
thatisintheendsolemnlychristened"theTruth."
The
mendasar
fundamental
beliefofmetaphysiciansisTHE
Kepercayaan
BELIEF
INANTITHESESOFVALUES.
It
pernah
never
occurredeventothewariestofthemto
meragukan
doubt
hereonthevery
ambang
threshold
(wheredoubt,however,was
paling
most
necessary);
thoughtheyhad
membuat
made
asolemnvow,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."
Forit
dapat
may
bedoubted,firstly,whetherantitheses
ada
exist
atall;
andsecondly,whetherthe
populer
popular
valuationsandantithesesof
nilai
value
uponwhichmetaphysicianshave
menetapkan
set
theirseal,arenotperhaps
hanya
merely
superficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,
selain
besides
beingprobablymadefrom
beberapa
some
corner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,to
meminjam
borrow
anexpressioncurrentamongpainters.
Inspiteof
semua
all
thevaluewhichmay
milik
belong
tothetrue,the
positif
positive
,andtheunselfish,itmightbepossiblethata
tinggi
higher
andmorefundamentalvaluefor
hidup
life
generallyshouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,to
keegoisan
selfishness
,andcupidity.
Itmight
bahkan
even
bepossiblethatWHAT
merupakan
constitutes
thevalueofthose
baik
good
andrespectedthings,consists
tepat
precisely
intheirbeinginsidiously
terkait
related
,knotted,andcrochetedtothese
jahat
evil
andapparentlyopposedthings—perhaps
bahkan
even
inbeingessentiallyidentical
dengan
with
them.
Perhaps!
Butwho
ingin
wishes
toconcernhimselfwithsuch
berbahaya
dangerous
"Perhapses"!
Forthatinvestigationone
harus
must
awaittheadventofa
baru
new
orderofphilosophers,suchas
akan
will
haveothertastesandinclinations,thereverseof
mereka
those
hithertoprevalent—philosophersofthe
berbahaya
dangerous
"Perhaps"ineverysenseofthe
istilah
term
.
Andtospeakinallseriousness,I
melihat
see
suchnewphilosophersbeginningto
muncul
appear
.
3.
Havingkepta
tajam
sharp
eyeonphilosophers,andhaving
membaca
read
betweentheirlineslong
cukup
enough
,Inowsaytomyself
bahwa
that
thegreaterpartof
sadar
conscious
thinkingmustbecountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,
dan
and
itissoeveninthe
kasus
case
ofphilosophicalthinking;
onehas
sini
here
tolearnanew,asone
belajar
learned
anewaboutheredityand"innateness."
Aslittleas
yang
the
actofbirthcomesinto
dipertimbangkan
consideration
inthewholeprocess
dan
and
procedureofheredity,justaslittleis"being-conscious"OPPOSEDto
yang
the
instinctiveinanydecisive
arti
sense
;
thegreaterpartofthe
sadar
conscious
thinkingofaphilosopherissecretlyinfluencedbyhisinstincts,
dan
and
forcedintodefinitechannels.
Dan
And
behindalllogicandits
tampak
seeming
sovereigntyofmovement,therearevaluations,
atau
or
tospeakmoreplainly,physiologicaldemands,forthe
pemeliharaan
maintenance
ofadefinitemodeof
hidup
life
Forexample,thatthecertainisworth
lebih
more
thantheuncertain,that
ilusi
illusion
islessvaluablethan"truth"suchvaluations,inspiteoftheirregulativeimportancefor
Kita
US
,mightnotwithstandingbeonly
dangkal
superficial
valuations,specialkindsofniaiserie,suchasmaybe
diperlukan
necessary
forthemaintenanceofbeingssuchasourselves.
Supposing,ineffect,
bahwa
that
manisnotjustthe"measureofthings."
4.
Thefalsenessof
sebuah
an
opinionisnotforusany
keberatan
objection
toit:
itishere,
mungkin
perhaps
,thatournewlanguage
terdengar
sounds
moststrangely.
Thequestionis,
cara
how
faranopinionislife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,
mungkin
perhaps
species-rearing,andwearefundamentallyinclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions
Untuk
(to
whichthesyntheticjudgmentsaprioribelong),arethe
paling
most
indispensabletous,that
tanpa
without
arecognitionoflogicalfictions,
tanpa
without
acomparisonofrealitywiththe
murni
purely
IMAGINEDworldofthe
mutlak
absolute
andimmutable,withouta
menerus
constant
counterfeitingoftheworldbymeansofnumbers,
manusia
man
couldnotlive—thattherenunciationof
salah
false
opinionswouldbearenunciationoflife,anegationoflife.
TORECOGNISEUNTRUTHASA
Kondisi
CONDITION
OFLIFE;
thatis
tentu
certainly
toimpugnthetraditionalideasof
nilai
value
inadangerousmanner,
dan
and
aphilosophywhichventurestodoso,hasthereby
saja
alone
placeditselfbeyondgood
dan
and
evil.
5.
Thatwhich
menyebabkan
causes
philosopherstoberegardedhalf-distrustfully
dan
and
half-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeated
penemuan
discovery
howinnocenttheyare—how
sering
often
andeasilytheymakemistakes
dan
and
losetheirway,inshort,howchildish
dan
and
childliketheyare,—butthat
ada
there
isnotenoughhonest
berurusan
dealing
withthem,whereasthey
semua
all
raisealoudandvirtuousoutcry
ketika
when
theproblemoftruthfulnessis
bahkan
even
hintedatintheremotestmanner.
They
semua
all
poseasthoughtheirrealopinionshadbeendiscovered
dan
and
attainedthroughtheself-evolvingofa
dingin
cold
,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(incontrastto
semua
all
sortsofmystics,who,fairer
dan
and
foolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,infact,aprejudiced
proposisi
proposition
,idea,or"suggestion,"whichis
umumnya
generally
theirheart'sdesireabstracted
dan
and
refined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtout
setelah
after
theevent.
Theyare
semua
all
advocateswhodonot
ingin
wish
toberegardedassuch,
umumnya
generally
astutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,whichtheydub"truths,"—and
Sangat
VERY
farfromhavingtheconsciencewhich
berani
bravely
admitsthistoitself,
sangat
very
farfromhavingthe
baik
good
tasteofthecouragewhich
pergi
goes
sofarasto
membiarkan
let
thisbeunderstood,perhapsto
memperingatkan
warn
friendorfoe,orin
ceria
cheerful
confidenceandself-ridicule.
ThespectacleoftheTartufferyof
tua
old
Kant,equallystiffanddecent,
dengan
with
whichheenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthat
mengarah
lead
(morecorrectlymislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousones
tersenyum
smile
,wewhofindnosmall
hiburan
amusement
inspyingoutthe
halus
subtle
tricksofoldmoralists
dan
and
ethicalpreachers.
Or,still
lebih
more
so,thehocus-pocusin
matematika
mathematical
form,bymeansofwhichSpinozahas,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyin
mail
mail
andmask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"to
menerjemahkan
translate
thetermfairlyandsquarely—inordertherebytostrike
teror
terror
atonceintothe
hati
heart
oftheassailantwho
harus
should
daretocasta
pandangan
glance
onthatinvinciblemaiden,thatPallasAthene:—how
banyak
much
ofpersonaltimidityandvulnerabilitydoes
ini
this
masqueradeofasicklyrecluse
mengkhianati
betray
!
6.
Ithasgradually
menjadi
become
cleartomewhat
setiap
every
greatphilosophyuptill
sekarang
now
hasconsistedof—namely,the
pengakuan
confession
ofitsoriginator,andaspeciesofinvoluntary
dan
and
unconsciousauto-biography;
andmoreoverthatthe
moral
moral
(orimmoral)purposein
setiap
every
philosophyhasconstitutedthe
sejati
true
vitalgermoutof
mana
which
theentireplanthas
selalu
always
grown.
Indeed,tounderstand
bagaimana
how
theabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsof
seorang
a
philosopherhavebeenarrived
pada
at
,itisalwayswell(andwise)tofirst
bertanya
ask
oneself:
"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Accordingly,Idonot
percaya
believe
thatan"impulsetoknowledge"isthe
ayah
father
ofphilosophy;
butthat
lain
another
impulse,hereaselsewhere,has
hanya
only
madeuseofknowledge(andmistaken
pengetahuan
knowledge!)
asaninstrument.
Butwhoever
mempertimbangkan
considers
thefundamentalimpulsesof
manusia
man
withaviewto
menentukan
determining
howfartheymay
telah
have
hereactedasINSPIRINGGENII
Atau
(or
asdemonsandcobolds),will
menemukan
find
thattheyhaveallpracticed
filsafat
philosophy
atonetimeoranother,
dan
and
thateachoneofthem
akan
would
havebeenonlytoo
senang
glad
tolookuponitselfastheultimateendof
keberadaan
existence
andthelegitimateLORD
atas
over
alltheotherimpulses.
For
setiap
every
impulseisimperious,andasSUCH,
mencoba
attempts
tophilosophize.
Tobe
tentu
sure
,inthecaseofscholars,in
yang
the
caseofreallyscientificmen,it
mungkin
may
beotherwise—"better,"ifyouwill;
ada
there
theremayreallybesucha
hal
thing
asan"impulsetoknowledge,"
beberapa
some
kindofsmall,independentclock-work,which,
ketika
when
wellwoundup,works
jauh
away
industriouslytothatend,
Tanpa
WITHOUT
therestofthescholarlyimpulses
mengambil
taking
anymaterialparttherein.
The
sebenarnya
actual
"interests"ofthescholar,therefore,are
umumnya
generally
inquiteanotherdirection—inthe
keluarga
family
,perhaps,orinmoney-making,
atau
or
inpolitics;
itis,in
bahkan
fact
,almostindifferentatwhat
titik
point
ofresearchhislittle
mesin
machine
isplaced,andwhether
yang
the
hopefulyoungworkerbecomesa
baik
good
philologist,amushroomspecialist,
atau
or
achemist;
heisnotCHARACTERISEDby
menjadi
becoming
thisorthat.
In
yang
the
philosopher,onthecontrary,
ada
there
isabsolutelynothingimpersonal;
dan
and
aboveall,hismoralityfurnishesa
menentukan
decided
anddecisivetestimonyastoWHOHEIS,—thatistosay,inwhat
urutan
order
thedeepestimpulsesofhisnature
berdiri
stand
toeachother.
7.
Betapa
How
maliciousphilosopherscanbe!
I
tahu
know
ofnothingmorestingingthan
yang
the
jokeEpicurustookthe
kebebasan
liberty
ofmakingonPlato
dan
and
thePlatonists;
hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Initsoriginal
arti
sense
,andonthefaceof
itu
it
,thewordsignifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessories
dan
and
lick-spittles;
besidesthis,however,itisasmuchasto
mengatakan
say
,"TheyareallACTORS,
ada
there
isnothinggenuineaboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwas
seorang
a
popularnameforan
aktor
actor)
.
AndthelatterisreallythemalignantreproachthatEpicuruscastuponPlato:
hewasannoyedbythegrandiose
cara
manner
,themiseenscene
gaya
style
ofwhichPlatoandhisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnota
master
master
!
He,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,who
duduk
sat
concealedinhislittle
kebun
garden
atAthens,andwrote
tiga
three
hundredbooks,perhapsoutof
kemarahan
rage
andambitiousenvyofPlato,who
tahu
knows
!
Greecetookahundredyearstofindout
siapa
who
thegarden-godEpicurusreallywas.
Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Ada
There
isapointin
setiap
every
philosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthe
filsuf
philosopher
appearsonthescene;
atau
or
,toputitinthewordsofan
kuno
ancient
mystery:.
Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
Youdesireto
Hidup
LIVE
"accordingtoNature"?
Oh,you
mulia
noble
Stoics,whatfraudofwords!
Imaginetoyourselvesabeing
seperti
like
Nature,boundlesslyextravagant,boundlesslyindifferent,
tanpa
without
purposeorconsideration,without
kasihan
pity
orjustice,atonce
berbuah
fruitful
andbarrenanduncertain:
bayangkan
imagine
toyourselvesINDIFFERENCEasapower—how
Bisa
COULD
youliveinaccordance
dengan
with
suchindifference?
Tolive—isnot
itu
that
justendeavouringtobeotherwise
dari
than
thisNature?
Isnotliving
menghargai
valuing
,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobe
berbeda
different
?
Andgrantedthatyourimperative,"living
sesuai
according
toNature,"meansactuallythe
sama
same
as"livingaccordingtolife"—how
bisa
could
youdoDIFFERENTLY?
Whyshouldyou
membuat
make
aprincipleoutofwhatyouyourselves
yang
are
,andmustbe?
Inreality,
namun
however
,itisquiteotherwise
dengan
with
you:
whileyoupretendto
membaca
read
withrapturethecanonofyour
hukum
law
inNature,youwant
sesuatu
something
quitethecontrary,you
luar biasa
extraordinary
stage-playersandself-deluders!
Inyour
kebanggaan
pride
youwishtodictateyourmorals
dan
and
idealstoNature,to
Alam
Nature
herself,andtoincorporatethem
dalamnya
therein
;
youinsistthatitshallbe
Alam
Nature
"accordingtotheStoa,"
dan
and
wouldlikeeverythingtobemade
setelah
after
yourownimage,asa
luas
vast
,eternalglorificationandgeneralismofStoicism!
Dengan
With
allyourlovefor
kebenaran
truth
,youhaveforcedyourselvesso
lama
long
,sopersistently,andwithsuchhypnoticrigidityto
melihat
see
NatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,
bahwa
that
youarenolongerableto
melihat
see
itotherwise—andtocrown
semua
all
,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamite
harapan
hope
thatBECAUSEyouareabletotyrannize
atas
over
yourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewill
juga
also
allowherselftobetyrannized
atas
over
:
isnottheStoica
Bagian
PART
ofNature?...
Butthisisan
lama
old
andeverlastingstory:
what
terjadi
happened
inoldtimeswith
yang
the
Stoicsstillhappenstoday,as
segera
soon
aseveraphilosophy
mulai
begins
tobelieveinitself.
It
selalu
always
createstheworldinits
sendiri
own
image;
itcannotdootherwise;
filsafat
philosophy
isthistyrannicalimpulseitself,
yang
the
mostspiritualWillto
Kekuatan
Power
,thewillto"creationof
yang
the
world,"thewillto
yang
the
causaprima.
10.
Theeagerness
dan
and
subtlety,Ishouldeven
mengatakan
say
craftiness,withwhichthe
masalah
problem
of"therealandtheapparentworld"isdealt
dengan
with
atpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishes
makanan
food
forthoughtandattention;
dan
and
hewhohearsonlya"WilltoTruth"inthe
latar belakang
background
,andnothingelse,cannot
tentu
certainly
boastofthesharpestears.
In
langka
rare
andisolatedcases,it
mungkin
may
reallyhavehappenedthat
seperti
such
aWilltoTruth—acertain
berlebihan
extravagant
andadventurouspluck,ametaphysician's
ambisi
ambition
oftheforlornhope—hasparticipated
dalamnya
therein
:
thatwhichintheend
selalu
always
prefersahandfulof"certainty"toa
seluruh
whole
cartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;
ada
there
mayevenbepuritanicalfanaticsofconscience,
yang
who
prefertoputtheir
terakhir
last
trustinasure
apa
nothing
,ratherthaninanuncertain
sesuatu
something
.
ButthatisNihilism,
dan
and
thesignofadespairing,mortallywearied
jiwa
soul
,notwithstandingthecourageousbearing
seperti
such
avirtuemaydisplay.
Itseems,
namun
however
,tobeotherwisewith
kuat
stronger
andlivelierthinkerswhoare
masih
still
eagerforlife.
InthattheysideAGAINST
penampilan
appearance
,andspeaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthe
kredibilitas
credibility
oftheirownbodies
tentang
about
aslowasthe
kredibilitas
credibility
oftheocularevidencethat"theearthstandsstill,"
dan
and
thus,apparently,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurest
kepemilikan
possession
toescape(forwhatdoesoneatpresent
percaya
believe
inmorefirmlythaninone'sbody?),—who
tahu
knows
iftheyarenotreally
mencoba
trying
towinbacksomethingwhichwasformerlyanevensecurer
kepemilikan
possession
,somethingoftheold
domain
domain
ofthefaithofformertimes,
mungkin
perhaps
the"immortalsoul,"perhaps"the
lama
old
God,"inshort,ideasbywhichthey
bisa
could
livebetter,thatistosay,morevigorously
dan
and
morejoyously,thanby"modernideas"?
Ada
There
isDISTRUSTofthese
modern
modern
ideasinthismodeof
melihat
looking
atthings,adisbeliefin
semua
all
thathasbeenconstructedyesterday
dan
and
today;
thereisperhaps
beberapa
some
slightadmixtureofsatiety
dan
and
scorn,whichcannolongerenduretheBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthe
paling
most
variedorigin,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresent
melemparkan
throws
onthemarket;
a
jijik
disgust
ofthemorerefined
selera
taste
atthevillage-fairmotleyness
dan
and
patchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhom
ada
there
isnothingeithernew
atau
or
true,exceptthismotleyness.
Thereinitseemstome
bahwa
that
weshouldagreewith
mereka
those
skepticalanti-realistsandknowledge-microscopistsofthepresent
hari
day
;
theirinstinct,whichrepelsthemfrom
Modern
MODERN
reality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
kita
us
!
ThemainthingaboutthemisNOT
bahwa
that
theywishtogo"back,"
tetapi
but
thattheywishto
mendapatkan
get
AWAYtherefrom.
Alittle
Lebih
MORE
strength,swing,courage,and
artistik
artistic
power,andtheywouldbeOFF—andnot
kembali
back
!
11.
Itseemstomethat
ada
there
iseverywhereanattemptatpresentto
mengalihkan
divert
attentionfromtheactual
pengaruh
influence
whichKantexercisedonGerman
filsafat
philosophy
,andespeciallytoignoreprudentlythe
nilai
value
whichhesetuponhimself.
Kantwas
pertama
first
andforemostproudofhis
Tabel
Table
ofCategories;
withitinhishandhesaid:
"Thisisthe
paling
most
difficultthingthatcouldeverbeundertakenon
nama
behalf
ofmetaphysics."
Letus
hanya
only
understandthis"couldbe"!
Hewas
bangga
proud
ofhavingDISCOVEREDa
baru
new
facultyinman,the
fakultas
faculty
ofsyntheticjudgmentapriori.
Granting
bahwa
that
hedeceivedhimselfin
ini
this
matter;
thedevelopmentand
pesat
rapid
flourishingofGermanphilosophydependedneverthelessonhispride,
dan
and
ontheeagerrivalryofthe
muda
younger
generationtodiscoverif
mungkin
possible
something—atallevents"newfaculties"—ofwhichtobe
tetap
still
prouder!—Butletusreflectforamoment—itishigh
waktu
time
todoso.
"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kant
bertanya
asks
himself—andwhatisreallyhisanswer?
"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—but
sayangnya
unfortunately
notinfivewords,
tapi
but
socircumstantially,imposingly,andwith
seperti
such
displayofGermanprofundity
dan
and
verbalflourishes,thatone
sama sekali
altogether
losessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemande
terlibat
involved
insuchananswer.
Orang
People
werebesidethemselveswith
kegembiraan
delight
overthisnewfaculty,
dan
and
thejubilationreacheditsclimaxwhenKantfurther
menemukan
discovered
amoralfacultyinman—forat
itu
that
timeGermanswerestill
moral
moral
,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."
Then
datang
came
thehoneymoonofGerman
filsafat
philosophy
.
AlltheyoungtheologiansoftheTubingen
lembaga
institution
wentimmediatelyintothegroves—all
mencari
seeking
for"faculties."
Andwhatdidtheynotfind—inthat
bersalah
innocent
,rich,andstillyouthful
periode
period
oftheGermanspirit,towhichRomanticism,the
jahat
malicious
fairy,pipedandsang,
ketika
when
onecouldnotyet
membedakan
distinguish
between"finding"and"inventing"!
Atas
Above
allafacultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristenedit,
intelektual
intellectual
intuition,andtherebygratified
yang
the
mostearnestlongingsof
yang
the
naturallypious-inclinedGermans.
One
bisa
can
donogreaterwrongtothe
seluruh
whole
ofthisexuberantand
eksentrik
eccentric
movement(whichwasreallyyouthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoary
dan
and
senileconceptions),thantotakeit
serius
seriously
,oreventreatit
dengan
with
moralindignation.
Enough,however—the
dunia
world
grewolder,andthedreamvanished.
A
masa
time
camewhenpeoplerubbedtheirforeheads,
dan
and
theystillrubthemtoday.
Orang
People
hadbeendreaming,and
pertama
first
andforemost—oldKant.
"Bymeansofameans(faculty)"—hehad
mengatakan
said
,oratleastmeantto
mengatakan
say
.
But,isthat—ananswer?
An
penjelasan
explanation
?
Orisitnotrather
hanya
merely
arepetitionofthe
pertanyaan
question
?
Howdoesopiuminduce
tidur
sleep
?
"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"
yaitu
namely
thevirtusdormitiva,repliesthe
dokter
doctor
inMoliere,.
Butsuchreplies
termasuk
belong
totherealmof
komedi
comedy
,anditishightimeto
menggantikan
replace
theKantianquestion,"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaPRIORIpossible?"
by
lain
another
question,"Whyisbeliefinsuchjudgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishightimethatweshould
memahami
understand
thatsuchjudgmentsmustbebelievedtobe
benar
true
,forthesakeofthe
pelestarian
preservation
ofcreatureslikeourselves;
meskipun
though
theystillmightnaturallybe
salah
false
judgments!
Or,moreplainlyspoken,
dan
and
roughlyandreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriori
seharusnya
should
not"bepossible"atall;
we
memiliki
have
norighttothem;
inourmouthstheyare
apa
nothing
butfalsejudgments.
Only,ofcourse,
yang
the
beliefintheirtruthis
diperlukan
necessary
,asplausiblebeliefandocular
bukti
evidence
belongingtotheperspectiveviewof
kehidupan
life
.
Andfinally,tocalltomindthe
besar
enormous
influencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
harap
hope
youunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughoutthe
seluruh
whole
ofEurope,thereis
tidak
no
doubtthatacertainVIRTUSDORMITIVA
memiliki
had
ashareinit;
thankstoGerman
filsafat
philosophy
,itwasadelighttothe
mulia
noble
idlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
dan
and
thepoliticalobscurantistsof
semua
all
nations,tofindanantidotetothe
masih
still
overwhelmingsensualismwhichoverflowedfromthe
lalu
last
centuryintothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...