Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Hungarian A1-B2 Students

Beyond Good and Evil | Progressive Translation Books for Hungarian A1-B2 Students

Experience the benefits of this forward-thinking translation strategy that tailors language learning to your specific needs. You have control over the difficulty, which ensures that the content is neither too easy nor overly challenging. This method enhances your ability to understand new words through context, reducing reliance on direct translations. While the translations are subtly obscured to foster learning, you can still look up unclear terms. This balanced approach makes language acquisition smoother and more enjoyable. Delve into these translated literary works and discover the satisfaction of mastering a language through reading.

PREFACE
SUPPOSINGthatTruthis
egy
a
woman—whatthen?
Istherenotgroundfor
gyanakodni
suspecting
thatallphilosophers,insofarastheyhavebeendogmatists,have
nem
failed
tounderstandwomen—thatthe
szörnyű
terrible
seriousnessandclumsyimportunitywithwhichtheyhave
általában
usually
paidtheiraddressestoTruth,havebeenunskilled
és
and
unseemlymethodsforwinning
egy
a
woman?
Certainlyshehasnever
engedte
allowed
herselftobewon;
és
and
atpresenteverykindofdogmastandswithsad
és
and
discouragedmien—IF,indeed,itstandsatall!
Fortherearescoffers
akik
who
maintainthatithasfallen,
hogy
that
alldogmaliesontheground—naymore,
hogy
that
itisatits
utolsó
last
gasp.
Buttospeak
komolyan
seriously
,therearegoodgroundsforhopingthat
minden
all
dogmatizinginphilosophy,whatever
ünnepélyes
solemn
,whateverconclusiveanddecidedairsit
van
has
assumed,mayhavebeen
csak
only
anoblepuerilismandtyronism;
és
and
probablythetimeisathand
amikor
when
itwillbeonce
és
and
againunderstoodWHAThas
valójában
actually
sufficedforthebasisof
olyan
such
imposingandabsolutephilosophicaledificesasthedogmatists
volt
have
hithertoreared:
perhapssome
népszerű
popular
superstitionofimmemorialtime(suchasthesoul-superstition,
amely
which
,intheformofsubject-
és
and
ego-superstition,hasnotyetceaseddoingmischief):
talán
perhaps
someplayuponwords,adeceptiononthepartof
nyelvtan
grammar
,oranaudaciousgeneralizationof
nagyon
very
restricted,verypersonal,veryhuman—all-too-humanfacts.
Thephilosophyofthedogmatists,itistobehoped,was
csak
only
apromiseforthousandsofyears
később
afterwards
,aswasastrologyin
még
still
earliertimes,intheserviceofwhich
valószínűleg
probably
morelabour,gold,acuteness,
és
and
patiencehavebeenspentthanon
bármely
any
actualsciencehitherto:
weowetoit,
és
and
toits"super-terrestrial"pretensionsinAsia
és
and
Egypt,thegrandstyleofarchitecture.
Itseemsthatinordertoinscribethemselvesupontheheartof
emberiség
humanity
witheverlastingclaims,all
nagy
great
thingshavefirstto
vándorolnia
wander
abouttheearthas
óriási
enormous
andawe-inspiringcaricatures:
dogmatic
filozófia
philosophy
hasbeenacaricatureofthiskind—forinstance,theVedanta
tanítás
doctrine
inAsia,andPlatonisminEurope.
Letusnotbeungratefultoit,
bár
although
itmustcertainlybeconfessedthatthe
legrosszabb
worst
,themosttiresome,andthemostdangerousoferrorshithertohasbeen
egy
a
dogmatisterror—namely,Plato'sinventionof
Tiszta
Pure
SpiritandtheGoodinItself.
De
But
nowwhenithasbeensurmounted,
amikor
when
Europe,ridofthisnightmare,can
újra
again
drawbreathfreelyandatleastenjoyahealthier—sleep,
mi
we
,WHOSEDUTYISWAKEFULNESSITSELF,aretheheirsofallthestrengthwhichthe
küzdelem
struggle
againstthiserrorhasfostered.
Itamountedtotheveryinversionof
igazság
truth
,andthedenialofthePERSPECTIVE—the
alapvető
fundamental
condition—oflife,tospeakofSpirit
és
and
theGoodasPlatospokeofthem;
indeedonemightask,asaphysician:
"Howdid
ilyen
such
amaladyattackthat
legkiválóbb
finest
productofantiquity,Plato?
Had
a
the
wickedSocratesreallycorrupted
őt
him
?
WasSocratesafterallacorrupterofyouths,
és
and
deservedhishemlock?"
Butthe
küzdelem
struggle
againstPlato,or—tospeakplainer,
és
and
forthe"people"—thestruggle
ellen
against
theecclesiasticaloppressionofmillenniumsof
Kereszténység
Christianity
(FORCHRISTIANITYISPLATONISMFORTHE"PEOPLE"),producedinEuropea
csodálatos
magnificent
tensionofsoul,suchas
vagy
had
notexistedanywherepreviously;
with
ilyen
such
atenselystrainedbowonecannowaimatthefurthestgoals.
Asamatterof
valójában
fact
,theEuropeanfeelsthistensionasastateofdistress,
és
and
twiceattemptshavebeen
hogy
made
ingrandstyletounbendthebow:
egyszer
once
bymeansofJesuitism,
és
and
thesecondtimebymeansof
demokratikus
democratic
enlightenment—which,withtheaidoflibertyofthepress
és
and
newspaper-reading,might,infact,bringitaboutthatthe
lélek
spirit
wouldnotsoeasily
találja
find
itselfin"distress"!
(TheGermansinventedgunpowder—allcreditto
nekik
them
!
buttheyagainmadethingssquare—theyinventedprinting.)
De
But
we,whoareneitherJesuits,nordemocrats,norevensufficientlyGermans,we
GOOD
EUROPEANS,andfree,VERY
szabad
free
spirits—wehaveitstill,
minden
all
thedistressofspirit
és
and
allthetensionofitsbow!
És
And
perhapsalsothearrow,
a
the
duty,and,whoknows?
THEGOALTOAIMAT....
Fejezet
CHAPTER
I.PREJUDICESOFPHILOSOPHERS
1.
TheWillto
Igazság
Truth
,whichistotemptusto
sok
many
ahazardousenterprise,the
híres
famous
Truthfulnessofwhichallphilosophershavehithertospokenwithrespect,whatquestionshas
ez
this
WilltoTruthnotlaidbefore
minket
us
!
Whatstrange,perplexing,questionablequestions!
Itisalready
egy
a
longstory;
yetitseemsasifitwere
alig
hardly
commenced.
Isitany
csoda
wonder
ifweatlastgrowdistrustful,losepatience,
és
and
turnimpatientlyaway?
That
ez
this
Sphinxteachesusatlastto
kérdezzük
ask
questionsourselves?
WHOisitreallythatputsquestionstoushere?
WHATreallyis
ez
this
"WilltoTruth"inus?
In
valójában
fact
wemadealonghaltatthe
kérdés
question
astotheoriginofthisWill—untilatlastwecametoanabsolutestandstill
előtt
before
ayetmorefundamental
kérdés
question
.
WeinquiredabouttheVALUEofthisWill.
Granted
hogy
that
wewantthetruth:
Miért
WHY
NOTRATHERuntruth?
And
bizonytalanság
uncertainty
?
Evenignorance?
Theproblemofthevalueof
igazság
truth
presenteditselfbeforeus—orwasitwe
akik
who
presentedourselvesbeforethe
probléma
problem
?
WhichofusistheOedipushere?
Melyik
Which
theSphinx?
Itwouldseemtobearendezvousofquestions
és
and
notesofinterrogation.
And
lehet
could
itbebelievedthatitatlastseemstousasiftheproblem
volna
had
neverbeenpropoundedbefore,asifwewerethefirsttodiscernit,getasightofit,
és
and
RISKRAISINGit?
Forthereis
kockázat
risk
inraisingit,perhapsthereis
nincs
no
greaterrisk.
2.
"HOWCOULD
valami
anything
originateoutofitsopposite?
Forexample,
igazság
truth
outoferror?
ortheWillto
Igazság
Truth
outofthewillto
megtévesztés
deception
?
orthegenerousdeedoutofselfishness?
vagy
or
thepuresun-brightvisionofthe
bölcs
wise
manoutofcovetousness?
Ilyen
Such
genesisisimpossible;
whoeverdreamsofitisafool,
sőt
nay
,worsethanafool;
thingsofthehighestvaluemusthavea
más
different
origin,anoriginofTHEIRown—inthistransitory,
csábító
seductive
,illusory,paltryworld,inthisturmoilofdelusion
és
and
cupidity,theycannothavetheirsource.
De
But
ratherinthelapofBeing,intheintransitory,intheconcealedGod,inthe'Thing-in-itself—THERE
kell
must
betheirsource,and
sehol
nowhere
else!"—Thismodeofreasoningdisclosesthe
tipikus
typical
prejudicebywhichmetaphysiciansof
minden
all
timescanberecognized,
ez
this
modeofvaluationisatthebackof
minden
all
theirlogicalprocedure;
throughthis"belief"oftheirs,theyexertthemselvesfortheir"knowledge,"forsomething
amit
that
isintheend
ünnepélyesen
solemnly
christened"theTruth."
The
alapvető
fundamental
beliefofmetaphysiciansisTHE
Hit
BELIEF
INANTITHESESOFVALUES.
Itneveroccurredeventothewariestofthemtodoubthereontheverythreshold(wheredoubt,
azonban
however
,wasmostnecessary);
thoughtheyhadmadea
ünnepélyes
solemn
vow,"DEOMNIBUSDUBITANDUM."
Foritmaybedoubted,
először
firstly
,whetherantithesesexistatall;
és
and
secondly,whetherthepopularvaluations
és
and
antithesesofvalueuponwhichmetaphysicianshavesettheirseal,arenotperhaps
csupán
merely
superficialestimates,merelyprovisionalperspectives,besidesbeingprobably
hogy
made
fromsomecorner,perhapsfrombelow—"frogperspectives,"asitwere,toborrow
egy
an
expressioncurrentamongpainters.
In
annak ellenére
spite
ofallthevaluewhichmaybelongtothetrue,thepositive,
és
and
theunselfish,itmightbe
lehetséges
possible
thatahigherandmorefundamentalvalueforlife
általában
generally
shouldbeassignedtopretence,tothewilltodelusion,toselfishness,
és
and
cupidity.
ItmightevenbepossiblethatWHATconstitutesthevalueofthose
good
andrespectedthings,consists
éppen
precisely
intheirbeinginsidiouslyrelated,knotted,
és
and
crochetedtotheseevil
és
and
apparentlyopposedthings—perhapseveninbeing
lényegében
essentially
identicalwiththem.
Perhaps!
De
But
whowishestoconcernhimselfwith
ilyen
such
dangerous"Perhapses"!
Forthatinvestigationonemustawaittheadventofa
új
new
orderofphilosophers,suchas
lesznek
will
haveothertastesandinclinations,thereverseofthosehithertoprevalent—philosophersofthe
veszélyes
dangerous
"Perhaps"ineverysenseofthe
kifejezés
term
.
Andtospeakin
minden
all
seriousness,Iseesuch
új
new
philosophersbeginningtoappear.
3.
Havingkeptasharpeyeonphilosophers,
és
and
havingreadbetweentheirlines
sokáig
long
enough,Inowsaytomyselfthatthe
nagyobb
greater
partofconsciousthinking
kell
must
becountedamongtheinstinctivefunctions,
és
and
itissoeveninthecaseof
filozófiai
philosophical
thinking;
onehashereto
tanulni
learn
anew,asonelearnedanewaboutheredity
és
and
"innateness."
Aslittleastheactofbirthcomesintoconsiderationinthewholeprocess
és
and
procedureofheredity,justaslittleis"being-conscious"OPPOSEDtotheinstinctivein
bármilyen
any
decisivesense;
thegreaterpartofthe
tudatos
conscious
thinkingofaphilosopheris
titokban
secretly
influencedbyhisinstincts,
és
and
forcedintodefinitechannels.
És
And
behindalllogicanditsseemingsovereigntyof
mozgás
movement
,therearevaluations,ortospeak
többet
more
plainly,physiologicaldemands,forthemaintenanceof
egy
a
definitemodeoflifeForexample,thatthecertainis
ér
worth
morethantheuncertain,that
illúzió
illusion
islessvaluablethan"truth"suchvaluations,inspiteoftheirregulativeimportanceforUS,mightnotwithstandingbeonlysuperficialvaluations,specialkindsofniaiserie,suchasmaybenecessaryforthemaintenanceofbeingssuchasourselves.
Supposing,ineffect,
hogy
that
manisnotjustthe"measureofthings."
4.
Thefalsenessof
egy
an
opinionisnotforusany
kifogás
objection
toit:
itishere,
talán
perhaps
,thatournewlanguagesoundsmoststrangely.
The
kérdés
question
is,howfaran
vélemény
opinion
islife-furthering,life-preserving,species-preserving,
talán
perhaps
species-rearing,andweare
alapvetően
fundamentally
inclinedtomaintainthatthefalsestopinions(towhichthesyntheticjudgmentsaprioribelong),arethe
leginkább
most
indispensabletous,that
nélkül
without
arecognitionoflogicalfictions,
nélkül
without
acomparisonofrealitywiththe
tisztán
purely
IMAGINEDworldofthe
abszolút
absolute
andimmutable,withouta
állandó
constant
counterfeitingoftheworldbymeansofnumbers,
ember
man
couldnotlive—thattherenunciationoffalseopinionswouldbearenunciationof
élet
life
,anegationoflife.
TORECOGNISEUNTRUTHASACONDITIONOF
Élet
LIFE
;
thatiscertainlytoimpugnthe
hagyományos
traditional
ideasofvaluein
egy
a
dangerousmanner,anda
filozófia
philosophy
whichventurestodoso,hasthereby
egyedül
alone
placeditselfbeyondgood
és
and
evil.
5.
Thatwhichcausesphilosopherstobe
tekintjük
regarded
half-distrustfullyandhalf-mockingly,isnottheoft-repeated
felfedezés
discovery
howinnocenttheyare—how
gyakran
often
andeasilytheymakemistakes
és
and
losetheirway,inshort,
milyen
how
childishandchildliketheyare,—butthat
nem
there
isnotenoughhonestdealingwiththem,whereastheyallraisea
hangosan
loud
andvirtuousoutcrywhentheproblemoftruthfulnessisevenhintedatintheremotestmanner.
Theyallposeasthoughtheir
valódi
real
opinionshadbeendiscovered
és
and
attainedthroughtheself-evolvingof
egy
a
cold,pure,divinelyindifferentdialectic(incontrasttoallsortsofmystics,
akik
who
,fairerandfoolisher,talkof"inspiration"),whereas,in
valójában
fact
,aprejudicedproposition,idea,
vagy
or
"suggestion,"whichisgenerallytheirheart's
vágya
desire
abstractedandrefined,isdefendedbythemwithargumentssoughtout
után
after
theevent.
Theyarealladvocates
akik
who
donotwishtoberegardedas
olyan
such
,generallyastutedefenders,also,oftheirprejudices,
amely
which
theydub"truths,"—andVERY
messze
far
fromhavingtheconscience
amely
which
bravelyadmitsthistoitself,
nagyon
very
farfromhavingthe
good
tasteofthecourage
amely
which
goessofarastolet
ezt
this
beunderstood,perhapsto
figyelmeztesse
warn
friendorfoe,orin
vidám
cheerful
confidenceandself-ridicule.
ThespectacleoftheTartufferyof
régi
old
Kant,equallystiffand
tisztességes
decent
,withwhichheenticesusintothedialecticby-waysthat
vezetnek
lead
(morecorrectlymislead)tohis"categoricalimperative"—makesusfastidiousonessmile,we
akik
who
findnosmallamusementinspyingoutthe
finom
subtle
tricksofoldmoralists
és
and
ethicalpreachers.
Or,stillmoreso,thehocus-pocusin
matematikai
mathematical
form,bymeansofwhichSpinoza
vagy
has
,asitwere,cladhisphilosophyinmail
és
and
mask—infact,the"loveofHISwisdom,"totranslatetheterm
tisztességesen
fairly
andsquarely—inordertherebytostriketerroratonceintotheheartoftheassailant
aki
who
shoulddaretocast
egy
a
glanceonthatinvinciblemaiden,thatPallasAthene:—howmuchofpersonaltimidity
és
and
vulnerabilitydoesthismasqueradeof
egy
a
sicklyreclusebetray!
6.
Ithas
fokozatosan
gradually
becomecleartomewhat
minden
every
greatphilosophyuptillnowhasconsistedof—namely,theconfessionofitsoriginator,
és
and
aspeciesofinvoluntary
és
and
unconsciousauto-biography;
andmoreoverthat
az
the
moral(orimmoral)purposein
minden
every
philosophyhasconstitutedthetrue
létfontosságú
vital
germoutofwhich
az
the
entireplanthasalwaysgrown.
Indeed,tounderstand
hogyan
how
theabstrusestmetaphysicalassertionsof
egy
a
philosopherhavebeenarrivedat,itis
mindig
always
well(andwise)to
először
first
askoneself:
"Whatmoralitydothey(ordoeshe)aimat?"
Ennek megfelelően
Accordingly
,Idonotbelievethatan"impulsetoknowledge"isthefatherof
filozófia
philosophy
;
butthatanotherimpulse,hereas
máshol
elsewhere
,hasonlymadeuseofknowledge(andmistakenknowledge!)
as
egy
an
instrument.
Butwhoeverconsidersthe
alapvető
fundamental
impulsesofmanwithaviewtodetermining
milyen
how
fartheymayhavehereactedasINSPIRINGGENII
Vagy
(or
asdemonsandcobolds),will
találja
find
thattheyhaveallpracticedphilosophyatonetime
vagy
or
another,andthateachoneofthemwould
volna
have
beenonlytoogladtolookuponitselfasthe
végső
ultimate
endofexistenceandthe
törvényes
legitimate
LORDoverallthe
más
other
impulses.
Foreveryimpulseisimperious,
és
and
asSUCH,attemptstophilosophize.
Tobesure,inthecaseofscholars,inthecaseof
igazán
really
scientificmen,itmaybeotherwise—"better,"
ha
if
youwill;
theretheremayreallybe
olyan
such
athingasan"impulsetoknowledge,"somekindof
kis
small
,independentclock-work,which,when
jól
well
woundup,worksawayindustriouslytothatend,WITHOUTthe
többi
rest
ofthescholarlyimpulsestaking
bármilyen
any
materialparttherein.
The
tényleges
actual
"interests"ofthescholar,
tehát
therefore
,aregenerallyinquiteanotherdirection—inthefamily,
talán
perhaps
,orinmoney-making,orinpolitics;
itis,in
valójában
fact
,almostindifferentatwhatpointof
kutatás
research
hislittlemachineisplaced,
és
and
whetherthehopefulyoungworker
lesz
becomes
agoodphilologist,amushroomspecialist,
vagy
or
achemist;
heisnotCHARACTERISEDby
lesz
becoming
thisorthat.
Inthephilosopher,onthecontrary,thereisabsolutelynothingimpersonal;
és
and
aboveall,hismoralityfurnishesa
döntő
decided
anddecisivetestimonyasto
Ki
WHO
HEIS,—thatistosay,inwhat
sorrendben
order
thedeepestimpulsesofhisnaturestandtoeachother.
7.
Milyen
How
maliciousphilosopherscanbe!
Iknowof
semmi
nothing
morestingingthanthe
vicc
joke
Epicurustookthelibertyof
csinált
making
onPlatoandthePlatonists;
hecalledthemDionysiokolakes.
Inits
eredeti
original
sense,andonthefaceofit,the
szó
word
signifies"FlatterersofDionysius"—consequently,tyrants'accessories
és
and
lick-spittles;
besidesthis,however,itisasmuchastosay,"TheyareallACTORS,thereis
semmi
nothing
genuineaboutthem"(forDionysiokolaxwasa
népszerű
popular
nameforanactor).
És
And
thelatterisreallythe
rosszindulatú
malignant
reproachthatEpicuruscastuponPlato:
hewasannoyedbythegrandiosemanner,themiseenscene
stílus
style
ofwhichPlatoandhisscholarsweremasters—ofwhichEpicuruswasnota
mester
master
!
He,theoldschool-teacherofSamos,who
ült
sat
concealedinhislittlegardenatAthens,
és
and
wrotethreehundredbooks,
talán
perhaps
outofrageand
ambiciózus
ambitious
envyofPlato,who
tudja
knows
!
Greecetookahundredyearstofindoutwho
a
the
garden-godEpicurusreallywas.
Didsheeverfindout?
8.
Thereis
egy
a
pointineveryphilosophyatwhichthe"conviction"ofthe
filozófus
philosopher
appearsonthescene;
vagy
or
,toputitinthewordsof
egy
an
ancientmystery:.
Adventavitasinus,Pulcheretfortissimus.
9.
Youdesireto
Élni
LIVE
"accordingtoNature"?
Oh,you
nemes
noble
Stoics,whatfraudofwords!
Imaginetoyourselves
egy
a
beinglikeNature,boundlessly
extravagáns
extravagant
,boundlesslyindifferent,withoutpurpose
vagy
or
consideration,withoutpityorjustice,atoncefruitful
és
and
barrenanduncertain:
imaginetoyourselvesINDIFFERENCEas
egy
a
power—howCOULDyoulivein
összhangban
accordance
withsuchindifference?
Tolive—isnotthat
csak
just
endeavouringtobeotherwise
mint
than
thisNature?
Isnotlivingvaluing,preferring,beingunjust,beinglimited,endeavouringtobedifferent?
És
And
grantedthatyourimperative,"livingaccordingtoNature,"
jelenti
means
actuallythesameas"livingaccordingtolife"—howcouldyoudo
Másképp
DIFFERENTLY
?
Whyshouldyoumakeaprincipleoutofwhatyouyourselvesare,
és
and
mustbe?
Inreality,
azonban
however
,itisquiteotherwisewithyou:
míg
while
youpretendtoreadwithrapturethecanonofyourlawin
Természet
Nature
,youwantsomethingquitethecontrary,you
rendkívüli
extraordinary
stage-playersandself-deluders!
Inyourprideyouwishto
diktálni
dictate
yourmoralsandidealstoNature,toNatureherself,
és
and
toincorporatethemtherein;
you
ragaszkodsz
insist
thatitshallbe
Természet
Nature
"accordingtotheStoa,"
és
and
wouldlikeeverythingtobemadeafteryour
saját
own
image,asavast,
örök
eternal
glorificationandgeneralismofStoicism!
Withallyourlovefor
igazság
truth
,youhaveforcedyourselvesso
sokáig
long
,sopersistently,andwith
olyan
such
hypnoticrigiditytoseeNatureFALSELY,thatistosay,Stoically,thatyouare
nem
no
longerabletoseeitotherwise—andtocrownall,someunfathomablesuperciliousnessgivesyoutheBedlamitehopethatBECAUSEyouareabletotyrannizeoveryourselves—Stoicismisself-tyranny—Naturewillalsoallowherselftobetyrannizedover:
isnottheStoica
Része
PART
ofNature?...
Butthisis
egy
an
oldandeverlastingstory:
what
történt
happened
inoldtimeswiththeStoics
még
still
happenstoday,assoonasever
egy
a
philosophybeginstobelieveinitself.
It
mindig
always
createstheworldinits
saját
own
image;
itcannotdo
másképp
otherwise
;
philosophyisthistyrannical
impulzus
impulse
itself,themostspiritual
Akarat
Will
toPower,thewillto"creationoftheworld,"the
akarat
will
tothecausaprima.
10.
Theeagerness
és
and
subtlety,Ishouldevensaycraftiness,withwhichtheproblemof"thereal
és
and
theapparentworld"isdealtwithatpresentthroughoutEurope,furnishesfoodforthought
és
and
attention;
andhewhohears
csak
only
a"WilltoTruth"inthebackground,
és
and
nothingelse,cannotcertainly
büszkélkedhet
boast
ofthesharpestears.
In
ritka
rare
andisolatedcases,itmay
tényleg
really
havehappenedthatsuch
egy
a
WilltoTruth—acertain
extravagáns
extravagant
andadventurouspluck,ametaphysician'sambitionoftheforlornhope—has
részt
participated
therein:
thatwhichintheend
mindig
always
prefersahandfulof"certainty"to
egy
a
wholecartloadofbeautifulpossibilities;
theremayevenbepuritanicalfanaticsofconscience,
akik
who
prefertoputtheir
utolsó
last
trustinasurenothing,rather
mint
than
inanuncertainsomething.
De
But
thatisNihilism,andthe
jele
sign
ofadespairing,mortallywearied
lélek
soul
,notwithstandingthecourageousbearing
ilyen
such
avirtuemaydisplay.
Itseems,
azonban
however
,tobeotherwisewith
erősebb
stronger
andlivelierthinkerswhoarestilleagerforlife.
Inthattheyside
Ellen
AGAINST
appearance,andspeaksuperciliouslyof"perspective,"inthattheyrankthe
hitelességét
credibility
oftheirownbodiesaboutaslowasthe
hitelességét
credibility
oftheocularevidencethat"the
föld
earth
standsstill,"andthus,
nyilvánvalóan
apparently
,allowingwithcomplacencytheirsecurestpossessiontoescape(forwhatdoesoneatpresentbelieveinmorefirmlythaninone'sbody?),—who
tudja
knows
iftheyarenot
tényleg
really
tryingtowinback
valami
something
whichwasformerlyanevensecurerpossession,
valami
something
oftheolddomainofthefaithof
korábbi
former
times,perhapsthe"immortalsoul,"
talán
perhaps
"theoldGod,"inshort,ideasby
ami
which
theycouldlivebetter,thatistosay,morevigorously
és
and
morejoyously,thanby"modernideas"?
ThereisDISTRUSTofthese
modern
modern
ideasinthismodeoflookingatthings,adisbeliefinall
hogy
that
hasbeenconstructedyesterday
és
and
today;
thereisperhaps
némi
some
slightadmixtureofsatiety
és
and
scorn,whichcannolongerenduretheBRIC-A-BRACofideasofthemostvaried
eredetű
origin
,suchasso-calledPositivismatpresent
dobja
throws
onthemarket;
a
undor
disgust
ofthemorerefined
ízlés
taste
atthevillage-fairmotleyness
és
and
patchinessofallthesereality-philosophasters,inwhomthereis
semmi
nothing
eithernewortrue,
kivéve
except
thismotleyness.
Thereinitseemstomethatwe
kell
should
agreewiththoseskepticalanti-realists
és
and
knowledge-microscopistsofthepresentday;
theirinstinct,
ami
which
repelsthemfromMODERNreality,isunrefuted...
whatdotheirretrogradeby-pathsconcern
minket
us
!
ThemainthingaboutthemisNOTthattheywishto
menni
go
"back,"butthattheywishtoget
El
AWAY
therefrom.
AlittleMOREstrength,swing,
bátorság
courage
,andartisticpower,andtheywouldbeOFF—andnot
vissza
back
!
11.
Itseemstome
amit
that
thereiseverywhereanattemptatpresenttodivert
figyelmet
attention
fromtheactualinfluencewhichKantexercisedonGermanphilosophy,
és
and
especiallytoignoreprudentlythevaluewhichhesetuponhimself.
Kantwasfirstand
elsősorban
foremost
proudofhisTableofCategories;
withitinhishandhe
mondta
said
:
"Thisisthemostdifficult
dolog
thing
thatcouldeverbeundertakenonbehalfofmetaphysics."
Letus
csak
only
understandthis"couldbe"!
Hewas
büszke
proud
ofhavingDISCOVEREDa
új
new
facultyinman,thefacultyofsynthetic
ítélet
judgment
apriori.
Grantingthathedeceivedhimselfinthismatter;
thedevelopment
és
and
rapidflourishingofGerman
filozófia
philosophy
dependedneverthelessonhispride,
és
and
ontheeagerrivalryoftheyoungergenerationtodiscover
ha
if
possiblesomething—atallevents"newfaculties"—ofwhichtobe
még
still
prouder!—Butletusreflectforamoment—itishightimetodoso.
"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaprioriPOSSIBLE?"
Kantaskshimself—andwhatisreallyhisanswer?
"BYMEANSOFAMEANS(faculty)"—but
sajnos
unfortunately
notinfivewords,
de
but
socircumstantially,imposingly,andwithsuchdisplayofGermanprofundity
és
and
verbalflourishes,thatone
teljesen
altogether
losessightofthecomicalniaiserieallemandeinvolvedinsuchananswer.
Emberek
People
werebesidethemselveswith
öröm
delight
overthisnewfaculty,
és
and
thejubilationreacheditsclimax
amikor
when
Kantfurtherdiscovereda
erkölcsi
moral
facultyinman—foratthat
időben
time
Germanswerestillmoral,notyetdabblinginthe"Politicsofhardfact."
Then
jött
came
thehoneymoonofGerman
filozófia
philosophy
.
AlltheyoungtheologiansoftheTubingen
intézmény
institution
wentimmediatelyintothegroves—allseekingfor"faculties."
És
And
whatdidtheynotfind—inthat
ártatlan
innocent
,rich,andstillyouthfulperiodoftheGerman
szellem
spirit
,towhichRomanticism,the
rosszindulatú
malicious
fairy,pipedandsang,
amikor
when
onecouldnotyet
megkülönböztetni
distinguish
between"finding"and"inventing"!
Aboveallafacultyforthe"transcendental";
Schellingchristenedit,
intellektuális
intellectual
intuition,andtherebygratifiedthemostearnestlongingsofthenaturallypious-inclinedGermans.
Onecando
nem
no
greaterwrongtothewholeofthisexuberant
és
and
eccentricmovement(whichwasreallyyouthfulness,notwithstandingthatitdisguiseditselfsoboldly,inhoary
és
and
senileconceptions),thantotakeit
komolyan
seriously
,oreventreatitwith
erkölcsi
moral
indignation.
Enough,however—theworldgrewolder,
és
and
thedreamvanished.
A
idő
time
camewhenpeoplerubbedtheirforeheads,
és
and
theystillrubthem
ma
today
.
Peoplehadbeendreaming,
és
and
firstandforemost—oldKant.
"Bymeansofameans(faculty)"—he
vagy
had
said,oratleastmeantto
mondani
say
.
But,isthat—ananswer?
Egy
An
explanation?
Orisitnot
inkább
rather
merelyarepetitionofthe
kérdés
question
?
Howdoesopiuminducesleep?
"Bymeansofameans(faculty),"
nevezetesen
namely
thevirtusdormitiva,repliesthe
orvos
doctor
inMoliere,.
Butsuchreplies
tartoznak
belong
totherealmof
komédia
comedy
,anditishigh
ideje
time
toreplacetheKantianquestion,"HowaresyntheticjudgmentsaPRIORIpossible?"
by
másik
another
question,"Whyisbeliefin
ilyen
such
judgmentsnecessary?"—ineffect,itishigh
ideje
time
thatweshouldunderstandthat
ilyen
such
judgmentsmustbebelievedtobetrue,forthesakeofthe
megőrzése
preservation
ofcreatureslikeourselves;
bár
though
theystillmightnaturallybe
hamis
false
judgments!
Or,moreplainlyspoken,
és
and
roughlyandreadily—syntheticjudgmentsapriorishouldnot"bepossible"atall;
wehave
nincs
no
righttothem;
inourmouthstheyarenothingbut
hamis
false
judgments.
Only,ofcourse,the
hit
belief
intheirtruthis
szükséges
necessary
,asplausiblebeliefandocularevidence
tartoznak
belonging
totheperspectiveviewof
élet
life
.
Andfinally,tocalltomindtheenormousinfluencewhich"Germanphilosophy"—I
remélem
hope
youunderstanditsrighttoinvertedcommas(goosefeet)?—hasexercisedthroughoutthewholeofEurope,thereisnodoubtthat
egy
a
certainVIRTUSDORMITIVAhad
egy
a
shareinit;
thankstoGermanphilosophy,itwasa
öröm
delight
tothenobleidlers,thevirtuous,themystics,theartiste,thethree-fourthsChristians,
és
and
thepoliticalobscurantistsof
minden
all
nations,tofindanantidotetothestilloverwhelmingsensualism
amely
which
overflowedfromthelastcenturyintothis,inshort—"sensusassoupire."...